course Phy 232 9/7 11 002. `query 2vvvv
.............................................
Given Solution: ** The rate at which thermal energy is conducted across for a object made of a given substance is proportional to the temperature gradient (the rate at which temperature changes across the object), and to the cross-sectional area of the object. The conductivity is the constant of proportionality for the given substance. So we have the proportionality equation • rate of thermal energy conduction = conductivity * temperature gradient * area, or in symbols • R = k * (`dT/`dx) * A. (note: R is the rate at which thermal energy Q is transferred with respect to clock time t. Using the definition of rate of change, we see that the average rate over a time interval is `dQ / `dt, and the instantaneous rate is dQ / dt. Either expression may be used in place of R, as appropriate to the situation.) For an object of uniform cross-section, `dT is the temperature difference across the object and `dx is the distance between the faces of the object. The distance `dx is often denoted L. Using L instead of `dx, the preceding proportionality can be written • R = k * `dT / L * A We can solve this equation for the proportionality constant k to get • k = R * L / (`dT * A). (alternatively this may be expressed as k = `dQ / `dt * L / (`dT * A), or as k = dQ/dt * L / (`dT * A)). Your Self-Critique: ok Your Self-Critique Rating: ok Question: Explain in terms of proportionalities how thermal energy flow, for a given material, is affected by area (e.g., is it proportional to area, inversely proportional, etc.), thickness and temperature gradient. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your Solution: Energy flow is directly proportional to the area, inversely proportional to thickness, and then directly proportional to the temperature gradient. confidence rating: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** CORRECT STUDENT ANSWER WITHOUT EXPLANATION: Energy flow is: • directly proportional to area • inversely propportional to thicknessand • directly proportional to temperature gradient Good student answer, slightly edited by instructor: The energy flow for a given object increases if the cross-sectional area (i.e., the area perpendicular to the direction of energy flow) increases. Intuitively, this is because the more area you have the wider the path available so more stuff can move through it. By analogy a 4 lane highway will carry more cars in a given time interval than will a two lane highway. In a similar manner, energy flow is directly proportional to cross-sectional area. Temperature gradient is the rate at which temperature changes with respect to position as we move from one side of the material to the other. That is, temperature gradient is the difference in temperature per unit of distance across the material: • temperature gradient is `dT / `dx. (a common error is to interpret temperature gradient just as difference in temperatures, rather than temperature difference per unit of distance). For a given cross-sectional area, energy flow is proportional to the temperature gradient. If the difference in the two temperatures is greater then the energy will move more quickly from one side to the other. For a given temperature difference, greater thickness `dx implies smaller temperature gradient `dT / `dx. The temperature gradient is what 'drives' the energy flow. Thus greater thickness implies a lesser temperature gradient the lesser temperature gradient implies less energy flow (per unit of cross-sectional area) per unit of time and we can say that the rate of energy flow (with respect to time) is inversely proportional to the thickness. Your Self-Critique: I didn’t explain, but I got the basic answer correct. Your Self-Critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: principles of physics and general college physics 13.8: coeff of expansion .2 * 10^-6 C^-1, length 2.0 m. What is expansion along length if temp increases by 5.0 C? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your Solution: I’m not sure if I have to do this problem, but to solve it you would use the equation dL = alpha * L0 * dt. This would be dL = .2 * 10^-6C^-1 *2 * 5 = 2 *10 ^-6 meters. confidence rating: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: This problem is solved using the concept of a coefficient of expansion. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion of a material, denoted alpha, is the amount of expansion per unit of length, per unit of temperature: • expansion per unit of length is just (change in length) / (original length), i.e., • expansion per unit of length = `dL / L0 Thus expansion per unit of length, per unit of temperature is (expansion per unit of length) / `dT. Denoting this quantity alpha we have • alpha = (`dL / L0) / `dT. This is the 'explanatory form' of the coefficient of expansion. In algebraically simplified form this is • alpha = `dL / (L0 * `dT). In this problem we want to find the amount of the expansion. If we understand the concept of the coefficient of expansion, we understand that the amount of the expansion is the product of the coefficient of expansion, the original length and the temperature difference: If we don’t completely understand the idea, or even if we do understand it and want to confirm our understanding, we can solve the formula alpha = `dL / (L0 * `dT) for `dL and plug in our information: • `dL = alpha * L0 * `dT = .2 * 10^-6 C^(-1) * 2.0 m * 5.0 C = 2 * 10^-6 m. This is 2 microns, two one-thousandths of a millimeter. By contrast the coefficient of expansion of steel is 12 * 10^-6 C^(-1); using this coefficient of expansion yields a change in length of 1.2 * 10^-4 m, or 120 microns, which is 60 times as much as for the given alloy. Your Self-Critique: ok Your Self-Critique Rating: ok ********************************************* Question: query univ 17.103 (15.93 10th edition) (Note that Principles of Physics and General College Physics students don't do University Physics problems). Your Solution: The thermal energy that is released would be found by taking 0.035 * 2.256 * 10^6 J/kg. The change in thermal energy would be 4186 * 0.035* (Tf-100). We would then have the equation [.446 * 390 * (Tf-0)] + [0.095 * 4186 * (Tf-0)] – 0.035 * 2.256 * 10^6 +4186 * 0.035 * (Tf-100) = 0 because the sum of all the thermal change is 0. We would then look for the temperature by taking 700 * Tf = 79000 which would make Tf= 130 C. This doesn’t really make sense thought because it can’t finish hotter than it initial started. confidence rating: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** Let Tf be the final temperature of the system. The ice doesn't change temperature until it's melted. It melts at 0 Celsius, and is in the form of water as its temperature rises from 0 C to Tf. Assuming that all the steam condenses, it releases .0350 kg * 2.256 * 10^6 J / kg of thermal energy into the rest of the system. The system will then come to temperature Tf so its change in thermal energy after being condensing to water will be 4186 J / (kg K) * .035 kg * (Tf - 100 C). The sum of all the thermal energy changes is zero, so we have the equation [.446 kg * 390 J/kg*K * (Tf - 0 C)] + [0.0950 kg * 4186 J/kg*K *(Tf - 0 C)] - .0350 kg * 2.256 x 10^6 J/kg + 4186 J / (kg K) * .035 kg * (Tf - 100 C) = 0. Noting that change in temperature of a Kelvin degree is identical to a change of a Celsius degree we get 170 J/C * Tf + 390 J/C * Tf - 79000 J - 14000 J + 140 J / C * Tf = 0 or 700 J / C * Tf = 93000 J, approx. or Tf = 130 C. This isn't possible—the system can’t possibly end up warmer than the original temperature of the steam. This solution was based on the assumption that all the steam condenses. We conclude that not all the steam condenses and that the system therefore reaches equilibrium at 100 C, so that in the end we therefore have a mixture of water and steam. We let mCondensed stand for the mass of the condensed steam. Energy conservation gives us [.446 kg * 390 J/kg*C * (100 C - 0 C)] + [0.0950 kg * 4186 J/kg*C *(100 C - 0 C)] - mCondensed * 2.256 x 10^6 J/kg = 0 Thus 17000 J + 39000 J - mCondensed * 2.3 * 10^6 J/kg = 0 or mCondensed = 56000 J / (2.3 * 10^6 J/kg) = .023 kg. We end up with .095 kg * .023 kg = .118 kg of water and .035 kg - .023 kg = .012 kg of steam all at 100 C. ** Your Self-Critique Your Self-Critique Rating: ********************************************* Question: query univ phy 17.100 (90 in 10th edition): C = 29.5 J/mol K + (8.2 + 10^-3 J/mol K^2) T . YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your Solution: confidence rating: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: ** In this case the specific heat is not constant but varies with temperature. The energy required to raise the temperature of 3 moles by `dT degrees (where `dT is considered to be small enough that the change in specific heat is insignificant) while at average temperature T is `dQ = 3 mol * C * dT = 3 mol * (29.5 J/mol K + (8.2 * 10^-3 J/mol K^2) T) * `dT. To get the energy required for the given large change in temperature (which does involve a significant change in specific heat) we integrate this expression from T= 27 C to T = 227 C, i.e., from 300 K to 500 K. An antiderivative of f(t) = (29.5 J/mol K + (8.2 + 10^-3 J/mol K^2) T) is F(T) = 29.5 J / (mol K) * T + (8.2 + 10^-3 J/mol K^2) * T^2 / 2. We simplify and apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and obtain F(500 K) - F(300 K). This result is then multiplied by the constant 3 moles. The result for Kelvin temperatures is about 3 moles * (F(500 K) – F(300 K) = 20,000 Joules. ** Your Self-Critique: Alright I see what I was supposed to do. I think I get it. Your Self-Critique Rating: 3 ********************************************* Question: University Physics Problem 17.106 (10th edition 15.96): YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your Solution: The final mass means .525 –(.34+.15) = 0.035 kg of steam at 71 C. The thermal energy change of the water and the calorimeter is 0.15 *420 * 56 + .34 *4187 * 56 = approx. 83, 250 Joules. The thermal energy of the condensed water would be –Hf * 0.035 +0.035 *4187 * -29 which would make it –Hf *0.035 -2930 Joules. We would then take 83,250 – Hf *0.035 -4930 which would make Hf = 2,257,000 Joules/kg. confidence rating: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: **The final mass of the system is .525 kg, meaning that .525 kg - (.340 kg + .150 kg) = .035 kg of steam condensed then cooled to 71 C. The thermal energy change of the calorimeter plus the water is .150 kg * 420 J/(kg C) * 56 C + .34 kg * 4187 J / (kg C) * 56 C = 83,250 J, approx. The thermal energy change of the condensed water is -Hf * .035 kg + .035 kg * 4187 J / (kg C) * (-29 C) = -Hf * .035 kg - 2930 J, approx. Net thermal energy change is zero, so we have • 83,250 J - Hf * .035 kg - 4930 J = 0 which is easily solved to give us • Hf = 79,000 J / (.035 kg) = 2,257,000 J / kg "