Your work on timer program has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
Each click two numbers pop up. The first number is how many seconds have passed since the initial click and the second number signifies the number of seconds between subsequent clicks.
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
1 20.73438 20.73438
2 20.91406 .1796875
3 21.07031 .15625
4 21.21094 .140625
5 21.32813 .1171875
6 21.46094 .1328125
7 21.60156 .140625
8 21.74219 .140625
9 21.89063 .1484375
10 22.03906 .1484375
11 22.17969 .140625
12 22.32813 .1484375
13 22.49219 .1640625
14 22.64063 .1484375
15 23.35938 .71875
16 23.5 .140625
17 23.66406 .1640625
18 23.80469 .140625
19 23.94531 .140625
20 24.19531 .25
21 24.35156 .15625
22 24.625 .2734375
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
Take (24.19531-20.73438)/20=0.1730465
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.1171875,1
.1328125,1
.140625,7
.1484375,4
.15625,1
.1640625,2
.1796875,1
.25,1
.71875,1
Your general comment to this point
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
These recorded times seem to be representative of some sort of fraction of a second. There is some flaw in the timer program, but it is not useless because it is still a good estimation.
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
These numbers are fairly consistent and small, so the TIMER program represents a good estimation.
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
4.6875
4.78125
5.492188
4.9375
4.59375
3.914063
3.6875
3.976563
4.335938
Your general comment to this point:
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
The fast clicks were more likely to fall within a certain amount of time surrounding the accuracy unit. For example if the timer gave an accuracy of plus or minus one second. Faster clicks would most likely round to the closest accurate value. If the answers were any more detailed it would signify more accuracy.
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
.01 because the fast click interval differences were on the order of .01.
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
The version of timer with file options will not work on my computer, if this is a problem let me know.
You have good data and very good answers to questions.
After the due date we will be discussing this experiment further via an online forum.