Assignment11

course Phy 231

Šj–Ú¤õO‹Pâéöÿçœl¥Ãµ¾y¢Ýƒassignment #011

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

011. Note that there are 12 questions in this set.

.Situations involving forces and accelerations.

Physics I

10-05-2007

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:29:12

`q001. A cart on a level, frictionless surface contains ten masses, each of mass 2 kg. The cart itself has a mass of 30 kg. A light weight hanger is attached to the cart by a light but strong rope and suspended over the light frictionless pulley at the end of the level surface.

Ignoring the weights of the rope, hanger and pulley, what will be the acceleration of the cart if one of the 2 kg masses is transferred from the cart to the hanger?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

We can treat the mass that is on the hanger as a free-fall object to get it's force. The acceleration on the hanging 2k mass is 9.8m/s^2, so we use the formula f = m*a to get the force in the downard direction.

F = 2kg * 9.8 m/s^2

F = 19.6N

Now to get the acceleration of the system, we consider the mass of the entire system, and we know the sum of the forces equal 19.6N (the forces in the horizontal direction are balanced out, the force of the cart on the table equals the force of the table on the cart). We can use the equation F=ma again to find the acceleration of the system.

19.6N = 50kg * a

a = 0.392m/s^2

Therefore the acceleration of the system is 0.392m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:29:34

At the surface of the Earth gravity, which is observed here near the surface to accelerate freely falling objects at 9.8 m/s^2, must exert a force of 2 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 19.6 Newtons on the hanging 2 kg mass.

This force will tend to accelerate the system consisting of the cart, rope, hanger and suspended mass, in the 'forward' direction--the direction in which the various components of the system must accelerate if the hanging mass is to accelerate in the downward direction. This is the only force accelerating the system in this direction.

All other forces, including the force of gravity pulling the cart and the remaining masses downward and the normal force exerted by the level surface to prevent gravity from accelerating the cart downward, are in a direction perpendicular to the motion of these components of the system; furthermore these forces are balanced so that they add up to 0.

The mass of the system is that of the 30 kg cart plus that of the ten 2 kg masses, a total of 50 kg.

The net force of 19.6 Newtons exerted on a 50 kg mass therefore results in acceleration

a = Fnet / m = 19.6 Newtons / (50 kg)

= 19.6 kg m/s^2 / (50 kg)

= .392 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:37:23

`q002. Two 1-kg masses are suspended over a pulley, one on either side. A 100-gram mass is added to the 1-kg mass on one side of the pulley. How much force does gravity exert on each side of the pulley, and what is the net force acting on the entire 2.1 kg system?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

First we will find the force of gravity on each side.

On the side that has just the 1kg mass, the force will just be gravity * mass = 9.8N

On the side that has 1.1kg mass, the force will be gravity * 1.1kg = 10.78N

Since one side has a greater force acting on it, it will be the side that moves downward and the other side will therefore have to move upward, so we subtract them.

The total force = 10.78N - 9.8N = 0.98N in the downard direction

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:38:14

The 1-kg mass experiences a force of F = 1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 9.8 Newtons. The other side has a total mass of 1 kg + 100 grams = 1 kg + .1 kg = 1.1 kg, so it experiences a force of F = 1.1 kg * 9.8 Newtons = 10.78 Newtons. {}{}Both of these forces are downward, so it might seem that the net force on the system would be 9.8 Newtons + 10.78 Newtons = 20.58 Newtons. However this doesn't seem quite right, because when one mass is pulled down the other is pulled up so in some sense the forces are opposing. It also doesn't make sense because if we had a 2.1 kg system with a net force of 20.58 Newtons its acceleration would be 9.8 m/s^2, and we know very well that two nearly equal masses suspended over a pulley won't both accelerate downward at the acceleration of gravity. So in this case we take note of the fact that the to forces are indeed opposing, with one tending to pull the system in one direction and the other in the opposite direction. {}{}We also see that we have to abandon the notion that the appropriate directions for motion of the system are 'up' and 'down'. We instead take the positive direction to be the direction in which the system moves when the 1.1 kg mass descends. {}{}We now see that the net force in the positive direction is 10.78 Newtons and that a force of 9.8 Newtons acts in the negative direction, so that the net force on the system is 10.78 Newtons - 9.8 Newtons =.98 Newtons. {}{}The net force of .98 Newtons on a system whose total mass is 2.1 kg results in an acceleration of .98 Newtons / (2.1 kg) = .45 m/s^2, approx.. Thus the system accelerates in the direction of the 1.1 kg mass at .45 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I didn't calculate the acceleration, but I did get the right force so finding it would have been easy.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:41:27

`q003. If in the previous question there is friction in the pulley, as there must be in any real-world pulley, the system in the previous problem will not accelerate at the rate calculated there. Suppose that the pulley exerts a retarding frictional force on the system which is equal in magnitude to 1% of the weight of the system. In this case what will be the acceleration of the system, assuming that it is moving in the positive direction (as defined in the previous exercise)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

When we considered the system to be frictionless, we had that one side had a force of 10.78N and the other had a force of 9.8N, and of course the heavier side decends, so we have a total force of 0.98N on the system. Now we must take friction into account, and friction always opposes the motion of direction. If friction is equal to 1% of the weight, then Ffric = 2.1kg* 1% = 0.021N in the direction opposite of motion.

If our force before was 0.98N, we will have to subtract the 0.021N from this to get the force that the system is accelerating downward with. The new force is then 0.959N and we can use our formula to calculate the acceleration.

F = m*a

0.959N = 2.1kg * a

a = 0.457 m/s^2 rounded off with 3 sig figs

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:43:25

We first determine the force exerted a friction. The weight of the system is the force exerted by gravity on the mass of the system. The system has mass 2.1 kg, so the weight of the system must be

2.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 20.58 Newtons.

1% of this weight is .21 Newtons, rounded off to two significant figures. This force will be exerted in the direction opposite to that of the motion of the system; since the system is assume to be moving in the positive direction the force exerted by friction will be

frictional force = -.21 Newtons.

The net force exerted by the system will in this case be 10.78 Newtons - 9.8 Newtons - .21 Newtons = .77 Newtons, in contrast with the .98 Newton net force of the original exercise.

The acceleration of the system will be

.77 Newtons / (2.1 kg) = .35 m/s^2, approx..

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I think you have a mistake in your problems here, 1% of 2.1kg is not .21kg, its 0.021kg. But the solution is obtained the same way regardless of the numbers.

self critique assessment: 2

We don't take 1% of 2.1 kg. We take 1% of the weight.

Weight is the force exerted by gravity. The weight of a 2.1 kg object is 2.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = .01 * 21 N = .21 N, approximately.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:44:18

`q004. Why was it necessary in the previous version of the exercise to specify that the system was moving in the direction of the 1.1 kg mass. Doesn't the system have to move in that direction?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Not necessarily, we could have pushed down on the 1kg weight and have the system accelerating in that system to start with, but of course the 1.1kg would slow that down, and eventually bring it to a stop and the system would begin to move in the opposite direction.

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:44:30

If the system is released from rest, since acceleration is in the direction of the 1.1 kg mass its velocity will certainly always be positive.

However, the system doesn't have to be released from rest. We could give a push in the negative direction before releasing it, in which case it would continue moving in the negative direction until the positive acceleration brought it to rest for an instant, after which it would begin moving faster and faster in the positive direction.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:47:14

`q005. If the system of the preceding series of exercises is initially moving in the negative direction, then including friction in the calculation what is its acceleration?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

If it's moving in the negative direction, then we have to subtract the forces 9.8 - 10.78 = -0.98N and if we have 1% friction moving in the opposite direction of motion, we get -0.959N. The weight of the system didn't change, so we still calculate acceleration the same way.

F = m*a

-0.959N = 2.1kg * a

a = -0.457 m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:48:21

Its acceleration will be due to the net force. This net force will include the 10.78 Newton force in the positive direction and the 9.8 Newton force in the negative direction. It will also include a frictional force of .21 Newtons in the direction opposed to motion.

Since motion is in the negative direction, the frictional force will therefore be in the positive direction. The net force will thus be

Fnet = 10.78 Newtons - 9.8 Newtons + .21 Newtons = +1.19 Newtons,

in contrast to the +.98 Newtons obtained when friction was neglected and the +.77 Newtons obtained when the system was moving in the positive direction. ,

The acceleration of the system is therefore ,

1.19 N / (2.1 kg) = .57 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

If it's moving in the negative direction is the 1kg weight not the one moving downward?

self critique assessment: 1

That would be so. Friction would then be opposing this motion, and would therefore be in the positive direction (toward the 1.1 kg mass). Friction would therefore be in the same direction as the net gravitational force, and the two forces would reinforce one another.

The 10.78 N and .21 N forces act in the positive direction, the 9.8 N force acts in the negative direction, and the net force os +1.19 N (i.e., 1.19 N in the direction of the 1.1 kg mass).

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:52:26

`q006. If friction is neglected, what will be the result of adding 100 grams to a similar system which originally consists of two 10-kg masses, rather than the two 1-kg masses in the previous examples?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

We need to calculate the force due to gravity on both sides again. On the side that has a 10kg mass, the force is 10kg * 9.8m/s^2 = 98N.

The side that has 10.1kg has a force of 10.1kg* 9.8m/s^2 = 98.98N.

The side that has the total force of 98.98N will move downward since it's force is greater, so the net force on the system is 98.98 - 98 = 0.98N (what we got in the first one).

To get it's acceleration we use our formula again:

F = ma

0.98N = 20.1kg * a

a = 0.049m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:52:34

In this case the masses will be 10.1 kg and 10 kg. The force on the 10.1 kg mass will be 10.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 98.98 Newtons and the force on the 10 kg mass will be 10 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 98 Newtons. The net force will therefore be .98 Newtons, as it was in the previous example where friction was neglected. We note that this.98 Newtons is the result of the additional 100 gram mass, which is the same in both examples. The mass in this case will be 20.1 kg, so that the acceleration of the system is a = .98 Newtons / 20.1 kg = .048 m/s^2, approx.. The same .98 Newton net force acting on the significantly greater mass results in a significantly smaller acceleration.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:56:13

`q007. If friction is not neglected, what will be the result for the system with the two 10-kg masses with .1 kg added to one side? Note that by following what has gone before you could, with no error and through no fault of your own, possibly get an absurd result here, which will be repeated in the explanation then resolved at the end of the explanation.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

I'm assuming we are to assume friction is 1% of the mass of the system again? If so we get the force of friction = 20.1kg * 1% = 0.201N

Without friction, our net force is 0.98N, but since Friction acts against the direction of motion, we have to subtract it out. Doing so gives us a net force of 0.779N

Acceleration = Force / Mass

a = 0.039 m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

10:58:09

If friction is still equal to 1% of the total weight of the system, which in this case is 20.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 197 Newtons, then the frictional force will be .01 * 197 Newtons = 1.97 Newtons. This frictional force will oppose the motion of the system.

For the moment assume the motion of the system to be in the positive direction. This will result in a frictional force of -1.97 Newtons. The net force on the system is therefore 98.98 Newtons - 98 Newtons - 1.97 Newtons = -.99 Newtons.

This net force is in the negative direction, opposite to the direction of the net gravitational force. If the system is moving this is perfectly all right--the frictional force being greater in magnitude than the net gravitational force, the system can slow down.

Suppose the system is released from rest. Then we might expect that as a result of the greater weight on the positive side it will begin accelerating in the positive direction. However, if it moves at all the frictional force would result in a -.99 Newton net force, which would accelerate it in the negative direction and very quickly cause motion in that direction. Of course friction can't do this--its force is always exerted in a direction opposite to that of motion--so friction merely exerts just enough force to keep the object from moving at all.

Friction acts as though it is quite willing to exert any force up to 1.97 Newtons to oppose motion, and up to this limit the frictional force can be used to keep motion from beginning.

In fact, the force that friction can exert to keep motion from beginning is usually greater than the force it exerts to oppose motion once it is started.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

This time your friction is 1% of the forces, not 1% of the weight.

self critique assessment: 2

You appear to be confusing mass and weight. See my previous note and let me know if that doesn't clarify the situation.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:01:58

`q008. A cart on an incline is subject to the force of gravity. Depending on the incline, some of the force of gravity is balanced by the incline. On a horizontal surface, the force of gravity is completely balanced by the upward force exerted by the incline. If the incline has a nonzero slope, the gravitational force (i.e., the weight of the object) can be thought of as having two components, one parallel to the incline and one perpendicular to the incline. The incline exerts a force perpendicular to itself, and thereby balances the weight component perpendicular to the incline. The weight component parallel to the incline is not balanced, and tends to accelerate the object down the incline. Frictional forces tend to resist this parallel component of the weight and reduce or eliminate the acceleration.

A complete analysis of these forces is best done using the techniques of vectors, which will be encountered later in the course. For now you can safely assume that for small slopes (less than .1) the component of the gravitational force parallel to the incline is very close to the product of the slope and the weight of the object. [If you remember your trigonometry you might note that the exact value of the parallel weight component is the product of the weight and the sine of the angle of the incline, that for small angles the sine of the angle is equal to the tangent of the angle, and that the tangent of the angle of the incline is the slope. The product of slope and weight is therefore a good approximation for small angles or small slopes.]

What therefore would be the component of the gravitational force acting parallel to an incline with slope .07 on a cart of mass 3 kg?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

The weight of the object can be found by multiplying the mass by gravity. This is 3kg * 9.8m/s^2 = 29.4N. If the component of the gravitational force is very near the product of the weight and and slope, we have 29.4N * 0.07 = 2.508m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:02:32

The gravitational force on a 3 kg object is its weight and is equal to 3 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 29.4 Newtons. The weight component parallel to the incline is found approximately as (parallel weight component) = slope * weight = .07 * 29.4 Newtons = 2.1 Newtons (approx.).. STUDENT COMMENT: It's hard to think of using the acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2 in a situation where the object is not free falling. Is weight known as a force measured in Newtons? Once again I'm not used to using mass and weight differently. If I set a 3 kg object on a scale, it looks to me like the weight is 3 kg.INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE: kg is commonly used as if it is a unit of force, but it's not. Mass indicates resistance to acceleration, as in F = m a. {}{}eight is the force exerted by gravity. {}{}The weight of a given object changes as you move away from Earth and as you move into the proximity of other planets, stars, galaxies, etc.. As long as the object remains intact its mass remains the same, meaning it will require the same net force to give it a specified acceleration wherever it is.{}{}An object in free fall is subjected to the force of gravity and accelerates at 9.8 m/s^2. This tells us how much force gravity exerts on a given mass: F = mass * accel = mass * 9.8 m/s^2. This is the weight of the object. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK, I did it the correct way using weight.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:03:37

`q009. What will be the acceleration of the cart in the previous example, assuming that it is free to accelerate down the incline and that frictional forces are negligible?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

The force of gravity on the cart was 2.058m/s^2 and the cart has a mass of 3kg, we can use the formula F = ma to solve for a.

F = m*a

a = 0.686 m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:03:46

The weight component perpendicular to the incline is balanced by the perpendicular force exerted by the incline. The only remaining force is the parallel component of the weight, which is therefore the net force. The acceleration will therefore be a = F / m = 2.1 Newtons / (3 kg) = .7 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Yep

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:05:27

`q010. What would be the acceleration of the cart in the previous example if friction exerted a force equal to 2% of the weight of the cart, assuming that the cart is moving down the incline? [Note that friction is in fact a percent of the perpendicular force exerted by the incline; however for small slopes the perpendicular force is very close to the total weight of the object].

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

First we need to find the force of friction which will act against the direction of motion.

Ffric = 2% * 3kg = 0.06N

Taking the original force to be about 2.1N, we have to subtract out the friction constant since it opposes motion. Doing so we get the net force to be 2.04N and we can use the F=ma equation again.

F = m*a

2.04N = 3kg * a

a = 0.68 m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:06:16

The weight of the cart was found to be 29.4 Newtons. The frictional force will therefore be .02 * 29.4 Newtons = .59 Newtons approx.. This frictional force will oppose the motion of the cart, which is down the incline.

If the downward direction along the incline is taken as positive, the frictional force will be negative and the 2.1 Newton parallel component of the weight will be positive. The net force on the object will therefore be

net force = 2.1 Newtons - .59 Newtons = 1.5 Newtons (approx.).

This will result in an acceleration of

a = Fnet / m = 1.5 Newtons / 3 kg = .5 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Ah, I took the friction to be 2% of mass, not weight, but I understand the problem.

self critique assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:08:50

`q011. Given the conditions of the previous question, what would be the acceleration of the cart if it was moving up the incline?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

Force of friction = 2% * 29.4 N = 0.588N opposite of motion

The force of gravity is still 2.1N

Since it's moving up the incline, the force of friction is positve this time making the net force = 2.1N + 0.588N = 2.688N

F = m*a

2.688N = 3kg * a

a = 0.896 m/s^2

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:08:55

In this case the frictional force would still have magnitude .59 Newtons, but would be directed opposite to the motion, or down the incline. If the direction down the incline is still taken as positive, the net force must be

net force = 2.1 Newtons + .59 Newtons = 2.7 Newtons (approx).

The cart would then have acceleration

a = Fnet / m = 2.7 Newtons / 3 kg = .9 m/s^2.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:11:33

`q012. Assuming a very long incline, describe the motion of the cart which is given an initial velocity up the incline from a point a few meters up from the lower end of the incline. Be sure to include any acceleration experienced by the cart.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

The cart will accelerate up the incline at a rate of -0.896 m /s /s, until it stops, and then it will accelerate back down the incline at an acceleration of 0.5 m/s/s until it reaches the end of the incline.

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

11:11:47

The cart begins with a velocity up the incline, which we still taken to be the negative direction, and an acceleration of +.9 m/s^2. This positive acceleration tends to slow the cart while it is moving in the negative direction, and the cart slows by .9 m/s every second it spends moving up the incline.

Eventually its velocity will be 0 for an instant, immediately after which it begins moving down the incline as result of the acceleration provided by the weight component parallel to the incline.

{}As soon as it starts moving down the incline its acceleration decreases to +.5 m/s^2, but since the acceleration and velocity are now parallel the cart speeds up, increasing its velocity by .5 m/s every second, until it reaches the lower end of the incline.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

OK

self critique assessment: 2

................................................."

You had some confusion between weight an mass in the earlier problems, but seem to have reonciled that by the end. Good work.

&#

Let me know if you have questions. &#