timer program

Phy 121

Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** Your General Comment **

** Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks **

A list was generated to document each time I clicked the button.

** Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks **

1 110.2969 110.2969

2 110.4531 .15625

3 110.6094 .15625

4 110.75 .140625

5 110.8906 .140625

6 111.0313 .140625

7 111.2031 .171875

8 111.3438 .140625

9 111.5 .15625

10 111.6406 .140625

11 111.7813 .140625

12 111.9375 .15625

13 112.0781 .140625

14 112.2344 .15625

15 112.375 .140625

16 112.5 .125

17 112.6406 .140625

18 112.7813 .140625

19 112.9219 .140625

20 113.0469 .125

21 113.2031 .15625

22 113.3281 .125

** Your average time interval for 20 time intervals **

0.1375

I dtermined the average by taking the first given number at line 20 from the timer and subtracting the starting number. Next, I divided by 20.

** Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed) **

.125, 3

.140625, 11

.15625, 6

.171875, 1

** Your general comment to this point **

** Why did you observe only certain time intervals? **

Maybe the timer is set to round up to set numbers versus always printing numbers exactly as they were no matter how long.

I think that as long as the timer is designed to consistently round numbers (if that's what they do) , then results/data when using the time are valid.

** What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals? **

The numbers that are in the last column also repeat consistently. I think this shows that this is how the timer was designed to represent data.

** Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths: **

3.484375

5.703125

6.140625

6.53125

6.625

6.875

6.8125

7.046875

8.734375

** Your general comment to this point: **

** Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice? **

I think there is a difference between the first set of results and now because the first time we were to click as fast as we could versus a more relaxed atmosphere the second time.

When you are in the mindset to do something very fast, you develop a pattern and may repeat. If you are in a more relaxed atmosphere (taking deep breaths) your actions are not always consistent.

** Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ... **

I think statement D is accurate, primarily because of seeing the difference in timing results from the first experiment to the second. If I had answered this question after the first experiment, my answer may not have been the same.

** Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program. **

series of regular breath times at beginning on inhalation

event number clock time time interval

1 690.5781 690.5781

2 694.0625 3.484375

3 700.6875 6.625

** **

35-40 minutes

** **

&#This looks good. Let me know if you have any questions. &#