assignment 25

course

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

assignment #025 025. `Query 25 Physics II 04-16-2006

......!!!!!!!!...................................

20:57:06 Query problem 16.15 charges 6 microC on diagonal corners, -6 microC on other diagonal corners of 1 m square; force on each. What is the magnitude and direction of the force on the positive charge at the lower left-hand corner?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 6 MicroC on diagonal corners, -6 MicroC on other diagonals. 1 m square, force on each. Find Magnitude and direction of force on (+) charge @ lower left corner.... Use the 6 MicroC and -6 MicroC to find force... 9*10^9 Nm^2/c^2 * 6 MicroC * 6 MicroC / 1 m^2 Force = 0.33 N All I can get is the force. I am not sure how to determine the rest of this. I know I will need to fine the force in all directions. From this I can find the magnitude by taking the square root of this.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:39 ** The charges which lie 1 meter apart are unlike and therefore exert attractive forces; these forces are each .324 Newtons. This is calculated using Coulomb's Law: F = 9 * 10^9 N m^2/C^2 * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) / ( 1 m)^2 = 324 * 10^-3 N = .324 N. Charges across a diagonal are like and separated by `sqrt(2) meters = 1.414 meters, approx, and exert repulsive forces of .162 Newtons. This repulsive force is calculated using Coulomb's Law: F = 9 * 10^9 N m^2/C^2 * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) * ( 6 * 10^-6 C) / ( 1.414 m)^2 = 162 * 10^-3 N = .162 N. The charge at the lower left-hand corner therefore experiences a force of .324 Newtons to the right, a force of .324 Newtons straight upward and a force of .162 Newtons at 45 deg down and to the left (at angle 225 deg with respect to the standard positive x axis, which we take as directed toward the right). This latter force has components Fy = .162 N sin(225 deg) = -.115 N, approx, and Fx = .162 N cos(225 deg) = -.115 N. The total force in the x direction is therefore -.115 N + .324 N = .21 N, approx; the total force in the y direction is -.115 N + .324 N = .21 N, approx. Thus the net force has magnitude `sqrt( (.21 N)^2 + (.21 N)^2) = .29 N at an angle of tan^-1( .21 N / .21 N) = tan^-1(1) = 45 deg. The magnitude and direction of the force on the negative charge at the lower right-hand corner is obtained by a similar analysis, which would show that this charge experiences forces of .324 N to the left, .324 N straight up, and .162 N down and to the right. The net force is found by standard vector methods to be about .29 N up and to the left. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> sqrt(2) m = 1.414 m F= 9*10^9 N m^2/c^2 * (6 * 10-6 C) * (6*10^-6) / (1.414 m)^2 F= .162 N Fy = .162 N sin (225 deg) Fy = -.115 N Fx = .162 N cos (225 deg) Fx= -.115 N Total Fx = -.115 N + .324 N = 0.21 N Total Fy = -.115 N + .324 N = 0.21 N Magnitude = sqrt (.21N^2) + (.21N^2) @ angle tan^-1 (.21 N/.21 N) = 45 deg Okay. I have made note of this. I am really not very good with all the sin and cos. I understand that the y direction is sin and x direction is cos I just get so confused. Math is not my thing!

You might want to run through a quick review Problem Set 5 from Physics I.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:42 query univ 21.68 (22.52 10th edition) 5 nC at the origin, -2 nC at (4 cm, 0). If 6 nC are placed at (4cm, 3cm), what are the components of the resulting force?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:44 ** The 5 nC charge lies at distance sqrt( 4^2 + 3^2) cm from the 6 nC charge, which is 3 cm from the charge at (4 cm ,0). The force exerted on the 6 nC charge by the two respective forces have magnitudes .00011 N and .00012 N respectively. The x and y components of the force exerted by the charge at the origin are in the proportions 4/5 and 3/5 to the total charge, giving respective components .000086 N and .000065 N. The force exerted by the charge at (4 cm, 0) is in the negative y direction. So the y component of the resultant are .000065 N - .00012 N = -.000055 N and its x component is .000086 N. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:48 Query univ 21.76 (10th edition 22.60) quadrupole (q at (0,a), (0, -a), -2q at origin). For y > a what is the magnitude and direction of the electric field at (0, y)?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:53 ** The magnitude of the field due to the charge at a point is k q / r^2. For a point at coordinate y on the y axis, for y > a, we have distances r = y-a, y+a and y. The charges at these distances are respectively q, q and -2q. So the field is k*q/(y - a)^2 + k*q/(y + a)^2 - 2k*q/y^2 = 2*k*q*(y^2 + a^2)/((y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) - 2*k*q/y^2 = 2*k*q* [(y^2 + a^2)* y^2 - (y+a)^2 ( y-a)^2) ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - (y^2 - a^2)^2 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - y^4 + 2 y^2 a^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [ 3 a^2 y^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) . For large y the denominator is close to y^6 and the a^4 in the numerator is insignifant compared to a^2 y^2 so the expression becomes 6 k q a^2 / y^4, which is inversely proportional to y^4. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:01:56 query univ 22.102 annulus in yz plane inner radius R1 outer R2, charge density `sigma.What is a total electric charge on the annulus?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:02:00 ** The total charge on the annulus is the product Q = sigma * A = sigma * (pi R2^2 - pi R1^2). To find the field at distance x along the x axis, due to the charge in the annulus, we first find the field due to a thin ring of charge: The charge in a thin ring of radius r and ring thickness `dr is the product `dQ = 2 pi r `dr * sigma of ring area and area density. From any small segment of this ring the electric field at a point of the x axis would be directed at angle arctan( r / x ) with respect to the x axis. By either formal trigonometry or similar triangles we see that the component parallel to the x axis will be in the proportion x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) to the magnitude of the field from this small segment. By symmetry only the x component of the field will remain when we sum over the entire ring. So the field due to the ring will be in the same proportion to the expression k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2). Thus the field due to this thin ring will be magnitude of field due to thin ring: k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2) * x / sqrt (x^2 + r^2) = 2 pi k r `dr * x / (x^2 + r^2)^(3/2). Summing over all such thin rings, which run from r = R1 to r = R2, we obtain the integral magnitude of field = integral ( 2 pi k r x / (x^2 + r^2)^(3/2) with respect to r, from R1 to R2). Evaluating the integral we find that magnitude of field = 2* pi k *x* | 1 /sqrt(x^2 + r1^2) - 1 / sqrt(x^2 + r2^2) | The direction of the field is along the x axis. If the point is close to the origin then x is close to 0 and x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) is approximately equal to x / r, for any r much larger than x. This is because the derivative of x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) with respect to x is r^2 / (x^2+r^2)^(3/2), which for x = 0 is just 1/r, having no x dependence. So at small displacement `dx from the origin the field strength will just be some constant multiple of `dx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

?h???????????? assignment #026 ??k???K???????o??q? Physics II 04-16-2006

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:08:41 Query problem 16.32. field 745 N/C midway between two equal and opposite point charges separated by 16 cm. What is the magnitude of each charge?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 745 N/c midway between 2 equal and opposite charges separated by 16 cm. E = 1/2 * N/c for this 0.5 * (745 N/C) = 373 N/c E = k* q /r^2 373 N/c = [9*10^9 N m^2/c^2] * q / (0.08 m)^2 Rearrange and solve for q = 373 N/c * (0.08m)^2 / [9*10^9 N m^2/c^2] q =2.652 * 10^-10 C

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:09:38 ** If the magnitude of the charge is q then the field contribution of each charge is k q / r^2, with r = 8 cm = .08 meters. Since both charges contribute equally to the field, with the fields produced by both charges being in the same direction (on any test charge at the midpoint one force is of repulsion and the other of attraction, and the charges are on opposite sides of the midpoint), the field of either charge has magnitude 1/2 (745 N/C) = 373 N/C. Thus E = 373 N/C and E = k q / r^2. We know k, E and r so we solve for q to obtain q = E * r^2 / k = 373 N/C * (.08 m)^2 / (9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2) = 373 N/C * .0064 m^2 / (9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2) = 2.6 * 10^-10 C, approx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> Okay.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:10:42 If the charges are represented by Q and -Q, what is the electric field at the midpoint?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> At midpoint it would be the equilibrium between the (-)Q and (+)Q.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:10 ** this calls for a symbolic expression in terms of the symbol Q. The field would be 2 k Q / r^2, where r=.08 meters and the factor 2 is because there are two charges of magnitude Q both at the same distance from the point. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> 2 k Q /r^2 2 charges at magnitude Q, at same distance from midpoint

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:14 query univ 22.30 (10th edition 23.30). Cube with faces S1 in xz plane, S2 top, S3 right side, S4 bottom, S5 front, S6 back on yz plane. E = -5 N/(C m) x i + 3 N/(C m) z k. What is the flux through each face of the cube, and what is the total charge enclosed by the cube?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:17 **** Advance correction of a common misconception: Flux is not a vector quantity so your flux values will not be multiples of the i, j and k vectors. The vectors normal to S1, S2, ..., S6 are respectively -j, k, j, -k, i and -i. For any face the flux is the dot product of the field with the normal vector, multiplied by the area. The area of each face is (.3 m)^2 = .09 m^2 So we have: For S1 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot (-j) * .09 m^2 = 0. For S2 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot ( k) * .09 m^2 = 3 z N / (C m) * .09 m^2. For S3 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot ( j) * .09 m^2 = 0. For S4 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot (-k) * .09 m^2 = -3 z N / (C m) * .09 m^2. For S5 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot ( i) * .09 m^2 = -5 x N / (C m) * .09 m^2. For S6 the flux is (-5 x N / (C m) * i + 3 z N / (C m) k ) dot (-i) * .09 m^2 = 5 x N / (C m) * .09 m^2. On S2 and S4 we have z = .3 m and z = 0 m, respectively, giving us flux .027 N m^2 / C on S2 and flux 0 on S4. On S5 and S6 we have x = .3 m and x = 0 m, respectively, giving us flux -.045 N m^2 / C on S5 and flux 0 on S6. The total flux is therefore .027 N m^2 / C - .045 N m^2 / C = -.018 N m^2 / C. Since the total flux is 4 pi k Q, where Q is the charge enclosed by the surface, we have 4 pi k Q = -.018 N m^2 / C and Q = -.018 N m^2 / C / (4 pi k) = -.018 N m^2 / C / (4 pi * 9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2) = -1.6 * 10^-13 C, approx. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:25 query univ 22.37 (23.27 10th edition) Spherical conducting shell inner radius a outer b, concentric with larger conducting shell inner radius c outer d. Total charges +2q, +4q. Give your solution.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> Enter, as appropriate, an answer to the question, a critique of your answer in response to a given answer, your insights regarding the situation at this point, notes to yourself, or just an OK. Always critique your solutions by describing any insights you had or errors you makde, and by explaining how you can make use of the insight or how you now know how to avoid certain errors. Also pose for the instructor any question or questions that you have related to the problem or series of problems.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:28 ** The electric field inside either shell must be zero, so the charge enclosed by any sphere concentric with the shells and lying within either shell must be zero, and the field is zero for a < r < b and for c < r < d. Thus the total charge on the inner surface of the innermost shell is zero, since this shell encloses no charge. The entire charge 2q of the innermost shell in concentrated on its outer surface. For any r such that b < r < c the charge enclosed by the corresponding sphere is the 2 q of the innermost shell, so that the electric field is 4 pi k * 2q / r^2 = 8 pi k q / r^2. Considering a sphere which encloses the inner but not the outer surface of the second shell we see that this sphere must contain the charge 2q of the innermost shell. Since this sphere is within the conducting material the electric field on this sphere is zero and the net flux thru this sphere is zero. Thus the total charge enclosed by this sphere is zero. Since the charge enclosed by the sphere includes the 2q of the innermost shell, the sphere must also enclose a charge -2 q, which by symmetry must be evenly distributed on the inner surface of the second shell. Any sphere which encloses both shells must enclose the total charge of both shells, which is 6 q. Since we have 2q on the innermost shell and -2q on the inner surface of the second shell the charge on the outer surface of this shell must be 6 q. For any r such that d < r the charge enclosed by the corresponding sphere is the 6 q of the two shells, so that the electric field is 4 pi k * 6q / r^2 = 24 pi k q / r^2. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:32 query univ 23.46 (23.34 10th edition). Long conducting tube inner radius a, outer b. Lin chg density `alpha. Line of charge, same density along axis.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:11:37 **The Gaussian surfaces appropriate to this configuration are cylinders of length L which are coaxial with the line charge. The symmetries of the situation dictate that the electric field is everywhere radial and hence that the field passes through the curved surface of each cylinder at right angle to that surface. The surface area of the curved portion of any such surface is 2 pi r L, where r is the radius of the cylinder. For r < a the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface is L * alpha so that the flux is charge enclosed = 4 pi k L * alpha and the electric field is electric field = flux / area = 4 pi k L * alpha / (2 pi r L ) = 2 k alpha / r. For a < r < b, a Gaussian surface of radius r lies within the conductor so the field is zero (recall that if the field wasn't zero, the free charges inside the conductor would move and we wouldn't be in a steady state). So the net charge enclosed by this surface is zero. Since the line charge enclosed by the surface is L * alpha, the inner surface of the conductor must therefore contain the equal and opposite charge -L * alpha, so that the inner surface carries charge density -alpha. For b < r the Gaussian surface encloses both the line charge and the charge of the cylindrical shell, each of which has charge density alpha, so the charge enclosed is 2 L * alpha and the electric field is radial with magnitude 4 pi k * 2 L * alpha / (2 pi r L ) = 4 k alpha / r. Since the enclosed charge that of the line charge (L * alpha) as well as the inner surface of the shell (L * (-alpha) ), which the entire system carries charge L * alpha, we have line charge + charge on inner sphere + charge on outer sphere = alpha * L, we have alpha * L - alpha * L + charge on outer sphere = alpha * L, so charge on outer sphere = 2 alpha * L, so the outer surface of the shell has charge density 2 alpha. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

???yj??????? assignment #027 027. `Query 27 Physics II 04-16-2006

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:14:06 Note that the solutions given here use k notation rather than epsilon0 notation. The k notation is more closely related to the geometry of Gauss' Law and is consistent with the notation used in the Introductory Problem Sets. However you can easily switch between the two notations, since k = 1 / (4 pi epsilon0), or alternatively epsilon0 = 1 / (4 pi k).

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> k = 1/ (4 pi K) Okay!

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:20:17 Query text problem 17.18 potential 2.5 * 10^-15 m from proton; PE of two protons at this separation in a nucleus. What is the electrostatic potential at a distance of 2.5 * 10^-15 meters?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> potential is 2.5 * 10^-15 m from proton PE of 2 protons at this sep at nucleus Electrostatic potential at 2.5 * 10^-15 m Well am I missing part of the information? I am at home for Easter break and I do not have my book. I only have my notes. I know v= k * q / r^2. I am just not sure of what to do dont I need q? I know k is [9 * 10^9 N m^2/c^2]. r is 2.5 * 10-15 m.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:22:26 STUDENT SOLUTION: For a part, to determine the electric potential a distance fo 2.5810^-15m away from a proton, I simply used the equation V = k q / r for electric potential for point charge: q = 1.60*10^-19C=charge on proton V = kq/r = 9.0*10^9N*m^2/C^2(1.60*10^-19C) / (2.5*10^-15m) = 5.8*10^5V. Part B was the more difficult portion of the problem. You have to consider a system that consists of two protons 2.5*10^-5m apart. The work done against the electric field to assemble these charges is W = qV. The potential energy is equal to the work done against the field. PE=(1.60*10^-19C)(5.8*10^5V) = 9.2*10^-14 J.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE --> q = 1.60 * 10 ^-19 C, is there some way to determine this without it being given. V = kq/r , not r^2! V= 9 * 10^8 NM^2 /c^2 (1.6*10^-19C) / 2.5 * 10 ^-15m V= 5.8 * 10^5V With this we find PE, q *V PE= 1.6*10^-19 C * 5.8*10^5V PE= 9.2 * 10^-14 J. Okay I am sorry.

You had it, except for the charge of the electron.

That information is in the inside cover of your text and you will be expected to know the charge of an electron, which will be used repeatedly for the next couple of weeks.

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:22:31 query univ phy 23.58 (24.58 10th edition). Geiger counter: long central wire 145 microns radius, hollow cylinder radius 1.8 cm. What potential difference between the wire in the cylinder will produce an electric field of 20,000 volts/m at 1.2 cm from the wire?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:22:34 ** The voltage V_ab is obtained by integrating the electric field from the radius of the central wire to the outer radius. From this we determine that E = Vab / ln(b/a) * 1/r, where a is the inner radius and b the outer radius. If E = 20,000 V/m at r = 1.2 cm then Vab = E * r * ln(b/a) = 20,000 V/m * ln(1.8 cm / .0145 cm) * .012 m = 1157 V. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:22:37 Query univ 23.78 (24.72 10th edition). Rain drop radius .65 mm charge -1.2 pC. What is the potential at the surface of the rain drop?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

21:22:40 STUDENT RESPONSE FOLLOWED BY SOLUTION: The problem said that V was 0 at d = inifinity, which I understnad to mean that as we approach the raindrop from infinity, the potential differencegrows from 0, to some amount at the surface of the raindrop. Because water molecules are more positive on one side that the other, they tend to align in a certain direction. Since positive charges tend to drift toward negative charge, I would think that the raindrop, with its overall negative charge, has molecules arranged so that their more positive sides are pointing toward the center and negative sides will be alighed along the surface of the raindrop. Probably all wrong. I tried several differnet integrand configuraitons but never found one that gave me an answer in volts. SOLUTION: You will have charge Q = -1.2 * 10^-12 C on the surface of a sphere of radius .00065 m. The field is therefore E = k Q / r^2 = 9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2 * (-1.2 * 10^-12 C) / r^2 = -1.08 * 10^-2 N m^2 / C / r^2. Integrating the field from infinity to .00065 m we get (-1.08 * 10^-2 N m^2 / C) / (.00065 m) = -16.6 N m / C = -16.6 V. If two such drops merge they form a sphere with twice the volume and hence 2^(1/3) times the radius, and twice the charge. The surface potential is proportional to charge and inversely proportional to volume. So the surface potential will be 2 / 2^(1/3) = 2^(2/3) times as great as before. The surface potential is therefore 16.6 V * 2^(2/3) = -26.4 volts, approx.. **

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

.................................................

"

I think you're doing OK here, but be sure to review vector procedures.

Let me know if you have questions.