course Mth 158 This one was very hard.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
10:56:44 **** query 1.7.20 (was 1.2.30). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) million to lend at 19% or 16%, max lent at 16% to average 18%.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> lend=x 18%=0.18 total = 1,000,000 19%=0.19 1,000,000 - x 16%=0.16 0.18x + 0.16(1,000,000 - x) = 190000
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:18:32 ** Good. The details: If x is the amount lent at 16%, then the amount lent at 19% is 1,000,000 - x. Interest on x at 16% is .16 x, and interest on 1,000,000 - x at 19% is .19 (1,000,000 - x). This is to be equivalent to a single rate of 18%. 18% of 1,000,000 is 180,000 so the total interest is 1,000,000. So the total interest is .16 x + .19(1,000,000 - x), and also 180,000. Setting the two equal gives us the equation .16 x + .19(1,000,000 - x) = 180,000. Multiplying both sides by 100 to avoid decimal-place errors we have 16 x + 19 ( 1,000,000 - x) = 18,000,000. Using the distributive law on the right-hand side we get 16 x + 19,000,000 - 19 x = 18,000,000. Combining the x terms and subtracting 19,000,000 from both sides we have -3 x = 18,000,00 - 19,000,000 so that -3 x = -1,000,000 and x = -1,000,000 / (-3) = 333,333 1/3. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I think I started doing it right, but I am not sure. Either that, or I had the right idea.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:42:10 **** query 1.7.36 (was 1.2.36). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) 3 mph current, upstream takes 5 hr, downstream 2.5 hr. Speed of boat?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> The correct number for this problem is 26 instead of 36. :) r = speed of current upstream rate = 3 - r time = 5/60 = 1/12 distance = 3 - r / 12 downstream rate = 3 + r time 2.5/60 = 1/24 distance = 3 + r / 24 3 - r / 12 = 3 + r / 24 12(3 - r) = 24(3+r) 36 - 12r = 72 + 24r 36 = 72 + 36r -36 = 36r r = -1
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
11:44:46 STUDENT SOLUTION: Speed of the boat is 9 mph, I used the equation 5(x - 3) = 2.5(x + 3) Reasoning is that it took 5 hours for the boat to travel against the 3mph current, and then traveled the same distance with the 3mph current in 2.5 hours. INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Good. The details: If we let x be the water speed of the boat then its actual speed upstream is x - 3, and downstream is x + 3. Traveling for 5 hours upstream, at speed x - 3, we travel distance 5 ( x - 3). Traveling for 2.5 hours downstream, at speed x + 3, we travel distance 2.5 ( x + 3). The two distance must be the same so we get 5 ( x - 3) = 2.5 ( x + 3) or 5 x - 15 = 2.5 x + 7.5. Adding -2.5 x + 15 to both sides we get 2.5 x = 22.5 so that x = 22.5 / 2.5 = 9. So the water speed is 9 mph. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> After reviewing your notes, I understand what you did. The reason I used the formula that you did was because number 25 looked the same as number 26 so I just used that to go by. The reason I didn't understand is because I was getting a negative. I knew that wasn't right, but I couldn't figure out any other way.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:16:19 **** query 1.7.32 (was 1.2.42). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) pool enclosed by deck 3 ft wide; fence around deck 100 ft. Pond dimensions if pond square, if rectangular 3/1 ratio l/w, circular; which pond has most area?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> if pond is square. 100/4 = 25 the diminsions would be the fence surrounding the deck with 25ft. on each side making a square with the deck being 3 ft inside of the fence on all 4 sides with the pond inside of that. if rectangular: l = 3w diminsions are l + 9 and w + 9 3(l + 9) + 3(w + 9) = 100 3(3w + 9) + 3(w + 9) = 100 9w + 27 + 3w + 27 = 100 12w + 54 = 100 12w = 46 w = 3.83 diminsions are 3.83ft. by 11.49ft. if circular: 100 ft. around and 3ft in between. diameter = 100 + 3 = 103/2 = 51.5 each will be 25.75 by 25.75 which pond has most area: area = l * w = 25.75(25.75) = 663.06 3.83(11.49) = 44.01 Circular pond has the most area.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:18:41 ** If the deck is circular then its circumference is C = 2 pi R and its radius is r = C / (2 pi). C is the 100 ft length of the fence so we have R = 100 ft / ( 2 pi ) = 50 ft / pi. The radius of the circle is 3 ft less, due to the width of the deck. So the pool radius is r = 50 ft / pi - 3 ft. This gives us pool area A = pi r^2 = pi ( 50 / pi - 3)^2 = pi ( 2500 / pi^2 - 300 / pi + 9) = 524, approx.. If the pool is square then the dimensions around the deck are 25 x 25. The dimensions of the pool will be 6 ft less on each edge, since each edge spans two widths of the deck. So the area would be A = 19 * 19 = 361. The perimeter of the rectangular pool spans four deck widths, or 12 ft. The perimeter of a rectangular pool is therefore 12 ft less than that of the fence, or 100 ft - 12 ft = 88 ft. If the pool is rectangular with length 3 times width then we first have for the 2 l + 2 w = 88 or 2 (3 w) + 2 w = 88 or 8 w = 88, giving us w = 11. The width of the pool will be 11 and the length 3 times this, or 33. The area of the pool is therefore 11 * 33 = 363. The circular pool has the greatest area, the rectangular pool the least. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> This one was very confusing. I forgot about r - c/2pi. I got the answer right at the end, but I didn't do the problem right. Now I understand a lot better. Word problems are very hard, and I can never get them right. Sorry. I am trying though.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:30:29 **** query 1.7.44 (was 1.2.54). Explain how you set up and solved an equation for the problem. Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text) 20 lb bag 25% cement 75% sand; how much cement to produce 40% concentration?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> (25 - c) + (75 - c) = 40 100 + (-2c) = 40 100 = 40 + 2c 60 = 2c c = 30 30% sand 10% cement
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:31:55 ** If x stands for the amount of cement added then we have the following: Original amount of cement in bag is 25% of 20 lb, or 5 lb. Original amount of sand in bag is 75% of 20 lb, or 15 lb. The final amount of cement will therefore be 5 lb + x, the final amount of sand will be 15 lb and the final weight of the mixture will be 20 lb + x. The mix has to be 40%, so (amt of cement) / (total amt of mixture) = .40. This gives us the equation (5 + x) / (20 + x) = .40. Multiplying both sides by 20 + x we have 5 + x = .40 ( 20 + x ). After the distributive law we have 5 + x = 80 + .40 x. Multiplying by 100 we get 500 + 100 x = 800 + 40 x. Adding -40 x - 500 to both sides we have 60 x = 300 so that x = 300 / 60 = 5. We should add 5 lbs of cement to the bag. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> I didn't really understand what the problem was asking.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:42:09 **** query 1.7.52 (was 1.2.60). Include your equation and the reasoning you used to develop the equation. Problem (note that this statement is for instructor reference; the full statement was in your text): without solving what's wrong with prob how many liters 48% soln added to 20 liters of 25% soln to get 58% soln?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> If your not adding but 48% soln then you can never reach a 58% mix because your mix adding is weaker. Adding would not benefit because you can't reach 58% by adding only 48% mixture.
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
12:43:00 ** Solution from Previous Student and Instructor Comment: It's not possible, adding a 25% solution to a 48% solution is only going to dilute it, I don't really know how to prove that algebraically, but logically that's what I think. (This is much like the last problem, that I don't really understand). INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: Right but the 48% solution is being added to the 25% solution. Correct statement, mostly in your words Adding a 48% solution to a 25% solution will never give you a 58% solution. Both concentrations are less than the desired concentration. **
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> correct.
.................................................
"