Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
I see 10 rows numbers
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
1 141.4844 141.4844
2 141.6719 .1875
3 141.8281 .15625
4 141.9688 .140625
5 142.1094 .140625
6 142.2344 .125
7 142.375 .140625
8 142.4844 .109375
9 142.625 .140625
10 142.7656 .140625
11 142.9063 .140625
12 143.0469 .140625
13 143.2031 .15625
14 143.3594 .15625
15 143.5156 .15625
16 143.6719 .15625
17 143.8125 .140625
18 143.9844 .171875
19 144.1406 .15625
20 144.2813 .140625
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.146875
I added up the first 20 intervals and divided them by 20.
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.1875, 1
.171875, 1
.125, 1
.109375, 1
.15625, 6
.140625, 10
Your general comment to this point
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
The timer is only specific down to a certain excent. It isn't flawed on useless.
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
I see that some of the numbers are negative. It can show if you were faster or slower than your previous try.
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
8.0625
7.8125
8.59375
8.578125
7.671875
8.640625
9.171875
8.578125
7.5625
7.912875
Your general comment to this point:
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
I think it would be harder to get the exact answer because it was much slower than the first try.
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
d.
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
number of relaxed breaths
event number clock time time interval
1 1370.641 1370.641
2 1378.703 8.0625
3 1386.516 7.8125
20 minutes
Your work on this experiment looks good.
Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
I see 10 rows numbers
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
1 141.4844 141.4844
2 141.6719 .1875
3 141.8281 .15625
4 141.9688 .140625
5 142.1094 .140625
6 142.2344 .125
7 142.375 .140625
8 142.4844 .109375
9 142.625 .140625
10 142.7656 .140625
11 142.9063 .140625
12 143.0469 .140625
13 143.2031 .15625
14 143.3594 .15625
15 143.5156 .15625
16 143.6719 .15625
17 143.8125 .140625
18 143.9844 .171875
19 144.1406 .15625
20 144.2813 .140625
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.146875
I added up the first 20 intervals and divided them by 20.
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.1875, 1
.171875, 1
.125, 1
.109375, 1
.15625, 6
.140625, 10
Your general comment to this point
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
The timer is only specific down to a certain excent. It isn't flawed on useless.
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
I see that some of the numbers are negative. It can show if you were faster or slower than your previous try.
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
8.0625
7.8125
8.59375
8.578125
7.671875
8.640625
9.171875
8.578125
7.5625
7.912875
Your general comment to this point:
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
I think it would be harder to get the exact answer because it was much slower than the first try.
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
d.
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
number of relaxed breaths
event number clock time time interval
1 1370.641 1370.641
2 1378.703 8.0625
3 1386.516 7.8125
20 minutes
Your work on this experiment looks good.