timer program

Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

Your General Comment

Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks

I see 10 rows numbers

Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks

1 141.4844 141.4844

2 141.6719 .1875

3 141.8281 .15625

4 141.9688 .140625

5 142.1094 .140625

6 142.2344 .125

7 142.375 .140625

8 142.4844 .109375

9 142.625 .140625

10 142.7656 .140625

11 142.9063 .140625

12 143.0469 .140625

13 143.2031 .15625

14 143.3594 .15625

15 143.5156 .15625

16 143.6719 .15625

17 143.8125 .140625

18 143.9844 .171875

19 144.1406 .15625

20 144.2813 .140625

Your average time interval for 20 time intervals

.146875

I added up the first 20 intervals and divided them by 20.

Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)

.1875, 1

.171875, 1

.125, 1

.109375, 1

.15625, 6

.140625, 10

Your general comment to this point

Why did you observe only certain time intervals?

The timer is only specific down to a certain excent. It isn't flawed on useless.

What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?

I see that some of the numbers are negative. It can show if you were faster or slower than your previous try.

Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:

8.0625

7.8125

8.59375

8.578125

7.671875

8.640625

9.171875

8.578125

7.5625

7.912875

Your general comment to this point:

Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?

I think it would be harder to get the exact answer because it was much slower than the first try.

Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...

d.

Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.

number of relaxed breaths

event number clock time time interval

1 1370.641 1370.641

2 1378.703 8.0625

3 1386.516 7.8125

20 minutes

Your work on this experiment looks good.

timer program

Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

Your General Comment

Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks

I see 10 rows numbers

Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks

1 141.4844 141.4844

2 141.6719 .1875

3 141.8281 .15625

4 141.9688 .140625

5 142.1094 .140625

6 142.2344 .125

7 142.375 .140625

8 142.4844 .109375

9 142.625 .140625

10 142.7656 .140625

11 142.9063 .140625

12 143.0469 .140625

13 143.2031 .15625

14 143.3594 .15625

15 143.5156 .15625

16 143.6719 .15625

17 143.8125 .140625

18 143.9844 .171875

19 144.1406 .15625

20 144.2813 .140625

Your average time interval for 20 time intervals

.146875

I added up the first 20 intervals and divided them by 20.

Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)

.1875, 1

.171875, 1

.125, 1

.109375, 1

.15625, 6

.140625, 10

Your general comment to this point

Why did you observe only certain time intervals?

The timer is only specific down to a certain excent. It isn't flawed on useless.

What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?

I see that some of the numbers are negative. It can show if you were faster or slower than your previous try.

Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:

8.0625

7.8125

8.59375

8.578125

7.671875

8.640625

9.171875

8.578125

7.5625

7.912875

Your general comment to this point:

Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?

I think it would be harder to get the exact answer because it was much slower than the first try.

Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...

d.

Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.

number of relaxed breaths

event number clock time time interval

1 1370.641 1370.641

2 1378.703 8.0625

3 1386.516 7.8125

20 minutes

Your work on this experiment looks good.