#$&*
Phy 242
Your 'flow experiment' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
** Flow Experiment_labelMessages **
** **
The picture below shows a graduated cylinder containing water, with dark coloring (actually a soft drink). Water is flowing out of the cylinder through a short thin tube in the side of the cylinder. The dark stream is not obvious but it can be seen against the brick background.
You will use a similar graduated cylinder, which is included in your lab kit, in this experiment. If you do not yet have the kit, then you may substitute a soft-drink bottle. Click here for instructions for using the soft-drink bottle.
• In this experiment we will observe how the depth of water changes with clock time.
In the three pictures below the stream is shown at approximately equal time intervals. The stream is most easily found by looking for a series of droplets, with the sidewalk as background.
Based on your knowledge of physics, answer the following, and do your best to justify your answers with physical reasoning and insight:
• As water flows from the cylinder, would you expect the rate of flow to increase, decrease or remain the same as water flows from the cylinder?
Your answer (start in the next line):
I expected the rate of flow to decrease as the water flow from the cylinder because the smaller the depth of the water in the cylinder, lesser the flow of water coming out.
#$&*
• As water flows out of the cylinder, an imaginary buoy floating on the water surface in the cylinder would descend.
• Would you expect the velocity of the water surface and hence of the buoy to increase, decrease or remain the same?
Your answer (start in the next line):
I expect the velocity to increase with the buoy floating on the water surface in the cylinder because of the weight of the buoy creates a force that push the solution down, which will cause more water to go through the hole.
#$&*
• How would the velocity of the water surface, the velocity of the exiting water, the diameter of the cylinder and the diameter of the hole be interrelated? More specifically how could you determine the velocity of the water surface from the values of the other quantities?
Your answer (start in the next line):
You can determine the velocity of the water surface from the values of the other quantities based on the factors of the specific quantities. The velocity of the water surface interrelates with the velocity of the exiting water by whatever the condition of the velocity of the water surface is in, it will be the same for the velocity of the exiting water. The velocity of the water surfaces interrelates with the diameter of the cylinder by the diameter determining the surface area of the water within the cylinder, which in turn can affect the amount of liquid going through the holes. The velocity of the water surface interrelates with the diameter of the hole by being a major factor of the flow of the exiting water. If the diameter of the hole is small, then the velocity of the exiting water will increase.
#$&*
• The water exiting the hole has been accelerated, since its exit velocity is clearly different than the velocity it had in the cylinder.
• Explain how we know that a change in velocity implies the action of a force?
Your answer (start in the next line):
We know that a change in velocity implies the action of a force by the force producing an effect to the original velocity that cause it to change (usually increase) the velocity.
#$&*
• What do you think is the nature of the force that accelerates the water from inside the cylinder to the outside of the outflow hole?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The nature of the force that accelerates the water from inside the cylinder to the outside of the outflow hole is the pressure produce when all of the water is trying going through the hole.
#$&*
From the pictures, answer the following and justify your answers, or explain in detail how you might answer the questions if the pictures were clearer:
• Does the depth seem to be changing at a regular rate, at a faster and faster rate, or at a slower and slower rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The depth seem to be changing at a regular rate because based on the three pictures, it seems that the level of the fluid surface and the flow of the fluid leaving out of the cylinder is decreasing in such a moderate rate in which the change of the rate occur when the fluid depth was decreasing.
#$&*
• What do you think a graph of depth vs. time would look like?
Your answer (start in the next line):
A depth vs time graph would have a decreasing slope moving in a moderate rate. The slope shows that while the time increase, the depth will decrease.
#$&*
• Does the horizontal distance (the distance to the right, ignoring the up and down distance) traveled by the stream increase or decrease as time goes on?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The horizontal distance traveled by the stream decrease as time goes on because the horizontal distance interrelates with the amount of fluids in the cylinder.
#$&*
• Does this distance change at an increasing, decreasing or steady rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The distance does change in a decreasing rate, in which the distance of the water from the cylinder will slowly decrease.
#$&*
• What do you think a graph of this horizontal distance vs. time would look like? Describe in the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The graph of this horizontal distance vs. time will have a decreasing slope, moving in a decreasing rate. The results of this specific type of the graph is that the horizontal distance will decrease while time increase, and since the rate will be moving in a slower rate, the line of best fit would be less steep than the average.
#$&*
You can easily perform this experiment in a few minutes using the graduated cylinder that came with your kit. If you don't yet have the lab materials, see the end of this document for instructions an alternative setup using a soft-drink bottle instead of the graduated cylinder. If you will be using that alternative, read all the instructions, then at the end you will see instructions for modifying the procedure to use a soft drink bottle.
Setup of the experiment is easy. You will need to set it up near your computer, so you can use a timing program that runs on the computer. The cylinder will be set on the edge of a desk or tabletop, and you will need a container (e.g., a bucket or trash can) to catch the water that flows out of the cylinder. You might also want to use a couple of towels to prevent damage to furniture, because the cylinder will leak a little bit around the holes into which the tubes are inserted.
• Your kit included pieces of 1/4-inch and 1/8-inch tubing. The 1/8-inch tubing fits inside the 1/4-inch tubing, which in turn fits inside the two holes drilled into the sides of the graduated cylinder.
• Fit a short piece of 1/8-inch tubing inside a short piece of 1/4-inch tubing, and insert this combination into the lower of the two holes in the cylinder. If the only pieces of 1/4-inch tubing you have available are sealed, you can cut off a short section of the unsealed part and use it; however don't cut off more than about half of the unsealed part--be sure the sealed piece that remains has enough unsealed length left to insert and securely 'cap off' a piece of 1/4-inch tubing.
• Your kit also includes two pieces of 1/8-inch tubing inside pieces of 1/4-inch tubing, with one end of the 1/8-inch tubing sealed. Place one of these pieces inside the upper hole in the side of the cylinder, to seal it.
• While holding a finger against the lower tube to prevent water from flowing out, fill the cylinder to the top mark (this will be the 250 milliliter mark).
• Remove your thumb from the tube at the same instant you click the mouse to trigger the TIMER program.
• The cylinder is marked at small intervals of 2 milliliters, and also at larger intervals of 20 milliliters. Each time the water surface in the cylinder passes one of the 'large-interval' marks, click the TIMER.
• When the water surface reaches the level of the outflow hole, water will start dripping rather than flowing continuously through the tube. The first time the water drips, click the TIMER. This will be your final clock time.
• We will use 'clock time' to refer to the time since the first click, when you released your thumb from the tube and allowed the water to begin flowing.
• The clock time at which you removed your thumb will therefore be t = 0.
Run the experiment, and copy and paste the contents of the TIMER program below:
Your answer (start in the next line):
1 2943.891 2943.891
2 2965.383 21.49219
3 3008.023 42.64063
4 3074.188 66.16406
#$&*
Measure the large marks on the side of the cylinder, relative to the height of the outflow tube. Put the vertical distance from the center of the outflow tube to each large mark in the box below, from smallest to largest distance. Put one distance on each line.
Your answer (start in the next line):
30 cm
20 cm
10 cm
#$&*
Now make a table of the position of the water surface vs. clock time. The water surface positions will be the positions of the large marks on the cylinder relative to the outflow position (i.e., the distances you measured in the preceding question) and the clock times will as specified above (the clock time at the first position will be 0). Enter 1 line for each event, and put clock time first, position second, with a comma between.
For example, if the first mark is 25.4 cm above the outflow position and the second is 22.1 cm above that position, and water reached the second mark 2.45 seconds after release, then the first two lines of your data table will be
0, 25.4
2.45, 22.1
If it took another 3.05 seconds to reach the third mark at 19.0 cm then the third line of your data table would be
5.50, 19.0
Note that it would NOT be 3.05, 19.0. 3.05 seconds is a time interval, not a clock time. Again, be sure that you understand that clock times represent the times that would show on a running clock.
The second column of your TIMER output gives clock times (though that clock probably doesn't read zero on your first click), the third column gives time intervals. The clock times requested here are those for a clock which starts at 0 at the instant the water begins to flow; this requires an easy and obvious modification of your TIMER's clock times.
For example if your TIMER reported clock times of 223, 225.45, 228.50 these would be converted to 0, 2.45 and 5.50 (just subtract the initial 223 from each), and these would be the times on a clock which reads 0 at the instant of the first event.
Do not make the common error of reporting the time intervals (third column of the TIMER output) as clock times. Time intervals are the intervals between clicks; these are not clock times.
Your answer (start in the next line):
0 sec, 30 cm
21.5 sec, 20 cm
64.14 sec, 10 cm
130.34 sec, 4 cm
#$&*
You data could be put into the following format:
clock time (in seconds, measured from first reading) Depth of water (in centimeters, measured from the hole)
0 14
10 10
20 7
etc. etc.
Your numbers will of course differ from those on the table.
The following questions were posed above. Do your data support or contradict the answers you gave above?
• Is the depth changing at a regular rate, at a faster and faster rate, or at a slower and slower rate?
Your answer (start in the next line):
My data does not support my hypothesis. The depth is not changing at a regular rate, but instead at a decreasing rate.
#$&*
• Sketch a graph of depth vs. clock time (remember that the convention is y vs. x; the quantity in front of the 'vs.' goes on the vertical axis, the quantity after the 'vs.' on the horizontal axis). You may if you wish print out and use the grid below.
Describe your graph in the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The graph of the water depth vs. clock time will have a decreasing slope, moving in a decreasing rate. The results of this specific type of the graph are that the water depth will decrease in the y axis while the clock time increases in the x axis. In the addition, since the rate will be moving in a slower rate, the line of best fit would be less steep than the average.
#$&*
caution: Be sure you didn't make the common mistake of putting time intervals into the first column; you should put in clock times. If you made that error you still have time to correct it. If you aren't sure you are welcome to submit your work to this point in order to verify that you really have clock times and not time intervals
Now analyze the motion of the water surface:
• For each time interval, find the average velocity of the water surface.
Explain how you obtained your average velocities, and list them:
Your answer (start in the next line):
I obtained the average velocities by dividing the water depth in centimeters with the time intervals that was given from the TIMER system.
0 cm/sec
.93 cm/sec
.235 cm/sec
.06 cm/sec
#$&*
• Assume that this average velocity occurs at the midpoint of the corresponding time interval.
What are the clock times at the midpoints of your time intervals, and how did you obtain them? (Give one midpoint for each time interval; note that it is midpoint clock time that is being requested, not just half of the time interval. The midpoint clock time is what the clock would read halfway through the interval. Again be sure you haven't confused clock times with time intervals. Do not make the common mistake of reporting half of the time interval, i.e., half the number in the third column of the TIMER's output):
Your answer (start in the next line):
10.75 sec
32.07 sec
65.17 sec
#$&*
@&
Your clock times are 21.5, 64.1 and 130.3 seconds.
10.75 is the halfway point of the first interval, which runs from 0 sec to 21.5 sec.
32.07 sec is not the halfway point of the second interval, which runs from clock time 21.5 sec oto clock time 64.1 sec. 32.07 sec is much closer to the beginning than to the end of that interval.
65.17 sec is not the midpoint of the third interval. It is very close to the beginning of the third interval, very far from the end.
This table, and any conclusions drawn from this table, will need to be redone.
*@
• Make a table of average velocity vs. clock time. The clock time on your table should be the midpoint clock time calculated above.
Give your table below, giving one average velocity and one clock time in each line. You will have a line for each time interval, with clock time first, followed by a comma, then the average velocity.
Your answer (start in the next line):
0, 0 cm/sec
10.75, .93 cm/sec
32.07, .235 cm/sec
65.17, .06 cm/sec
#$&*
• Sketch a graph of average velocity vs. clock time. Describe your graph, using the language of the Describing Graphs exercise.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The graph of the average velocity vs. clock time will have a decreasing slope, moving in an increasing rate. The results of this specific type of the graph are that the average velocity will decrease in the y axis while the clock time increases in the x axis. In the addition, since the rate will be moving in a slower rate, the line of best fit would be less steep than the average.
#$&*
• For each time interval of your average velocity vs. clock time table determine the average acceleration of the water surface. Explain how you obtained your acceleration values.
Your answer (start in the next line):
I obtained the average velocities by dividing the average velocities with the specific time intervals that was given from the TIMER system, chosen for the velocities.
.087 cm/sec^2
.007 cm/sec^2
9.20 * 10^ -4 cm/sec^2
#$&*
• Make a table of average acceleration vs. clock time, using the clock time at the midpoint of each time interval with the corresponding acceleration.
Give your table in the box below, giving on each line a midpoint clock time followed by a comma followed by acceleration.
Your answer (start in the next line):
10.75 sec, .087 cm/sec^2
32.07 sec, .007 cm/sec^2
65.17 sec, 9.20 * 10^ -4 cm/sec^2
#$&*
Answer two questions below:
• Do your data indicate that the acceleration of the water surface is constant, increasing or decreasing, or are your results inconclusive on this question?
• Do you think the acceleration of the water surface is actually constant, increasing or decreasing?
Your answer (start in the next line):
The acceleration of the water surface is decreasing.
The acceleration of the water surface is actually decreasing.
#$&*
Go back to your graph of average velocity vs. midpoint clock time. Fit the best straight line you can to your data.
• What is the slope of your straight line, and what does this slope represent? Give the slope in the first line, your interpretation of the slope in the second.
• How well do you think your straight line represents the actual behavior of the system? Answer this question and explain your answer.
• Is your average velocity vs. midpoint clock time graph more consistent with constant, increasing or decreasing acceleration? Answer this question and explain your answer.
Your answer (start in the next line):
The slope of the straight line is -0.0151.
The slope represents the decrease of the average velocity of the water coming out of the container during the increase of the clock time at their specific midpoints.
I believe that the straight line does a good job representing the actual behavior of the system because according the events that occurred from the experiment, the decrease of the water depth of the bottle was swift at the beginning only to slow down throughout the process until the majority of the water left the container.
My average velocity vs midpoint clock time graph is more consistent with the decreasing acceleration because since the velocities of the decrease of the water depth were decreasing as well, the acceleration have to follow the pattern since the accelerations came from the specific velocities of the water depth per seconds.
#$&*
Your instructor is trying to gauge the typical time spent by students on these experiments. Please answer the following question as accurately as you can, understanding that your answer will be used only for the stated purpose and has no bearing on your grades:
• Approximately how long did it take you to complete this experiment?
Your answer (start in the next line):
• 3 hours
You may add any further comments, questions, etc. below:
Your answer (start in the next line):
In this experiment, I use the bottle alternative with a hole that was .85 cm in width approximately 1 cm in length.
#$&*
*#&!
@&
See my note about your graph of velocity vs. midpoint clock time. Everything up to that point looks good, but I believe everything following that note will need to be redone.
&#Please see my notes and submit a copy of this document with revisions, comments and/or questions, and mark your insertions with &&&& (please mark each insertion at the beginning and at the end).
Be sure to include the entire document, including my notes. &#
*@