initial prob 5

course Mth 271

~nۍԨVʌassignment #005

Your work has been received. Please scroll through the document to see any inserted notes (inserted at the appropriate place in the document, in boldface) and a note at the end. The note at the end of the file will confirm that the file has been reviewed; be sure to read that note. If there is no note at the end, notify the instructor through the Submit Work form, and include the date of the posting to your access page.

005. Calculus

qa initial problems

06-08-2008

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:15:04

`q001. The graph of a certain function is a smooth curve passing through the points (3, 5), (7, 17) and (10, 29).

Between which two points do you think the graph is steeper, on the average?

Why do we say 'on the average'?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

i think that between (7,17) and (10,29) the graph is steeper. this is because for (3,5) and (7,17), there is a 4 point difference with the x axis and the y increases by 12. for the 2nd set, there is a 3 point x-axis difference but y also increases by 12.

1st set each point on x equals 3 on y

2nd set each point on x equals 4 on y

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:15:14

Slope = rise / run.

Between points (7, 17) and (10, 29) we get rise / run = (29 - 17) / (10 - 7) =12 / 3 = 4.

The slope between points (3, 5) and (7, 17) is 3 / 1. (17 - 5) / (7 -3) = 12 / 4 = 3.

The segment with slope 4 is the steeper. The graph being a smooth curve, slopes may vary from point to point. The slope obtained over the interval is a specific type of average of the slopes of all points between the endpoints.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:19:36

2. Answer without using a calculator: As x takes the values 2.1, 2.01, 2.001 and 2.0001, what values are taken by the expression 1 / (x - 2)?

1. As the process continues, with x getting closer and closer to 2, what happens to the values of 1 / (x-2)?

2. Will the value ever exceed a billion? Will it ever exceed one trillion billions?

3. Will it ever exceed the number of particles in the known universe?

4. Is there any number it will never exceed?

5. What does the graph of y = 1 / (x-2) look like in the vicinity of x = 2?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

1/(2.1-2)= 1/.1=10

1/(2.01-2)=1/.01=100

1/(2.001-2)=1/.001=1000

1. the values grow by one zero each time to increase by 10

2. yes it will, as each time you add extra .0 in front of the .1, it increases the number

3. i have no idea how to even guess how many particles there are, but i would say yes as you increase the digits

4. no

5. the graph is at 0,0 when x=2

self critique assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:21:02

For x = 2.1, 2.01, 2.001, 2.0001 we see that x -2 = .1, .01, .001, .0001. Thus 1/(x -2) takes respective values 10, 100, 1000, 10,000.

It is important to note that x is changing by smaller and smaller increments as it approaches 2, while the value of the function is changing by greater and greater amounts.

As x gets closer in closer to 2, it will reach the values 2.00001, 2.0000001, etc.. Since we can put as many zeros as we want in .000...001 the reciprocal 100...000 can be as large as we desire. Given any number, we can exceed it.

Note that the function is simply not defined for x = 2. We cannot divide 1 by 0 (try counting to 1 by 0's..You never get anywhere. It can't be done. You can count to 1 by .1's--.1, .2, .3, ..., .9, 1. You get 10. You can do similar thing for .01, .001, etc., but you just can't do it for 0).

As x approaches 2 the graph approaches the vertical line x = 2; the graph itself is never vertical. That is, the graph will have a vertical asymptote at the line x = 2. As x approaches 2, therefore, 1 / (x-2) will exceed all bounds.

Note that if x approaches 2 through the values 1.9, 1.99, ..., the function gives us -10, -100, etc.. So we can see that on one side of x = 2 the graph will approach +infinity, on the other it will be negative and approach -infinity.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

i figured if you divide something by 0 it would still equal 0 for this problem. i understand sorta how it works now.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:31:55

`q003. One straight line segment connects the points (3,5) and (7,9) while another connects the points (10,2) and (50,4). From each of the four points a line segment is drawn directly down to the x axis, forming two trapezoids. Which trapezoid has the greater area? Try to justify your answer with something more precise than, for example, 'from a sketch I can see that this one is much bigger so it must have the greater area'.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

for the 1st one, the x only covers a distance of 4 points and the y distance only overs 4 points.

for the 2nd one, x covers 40 points, but only 2 points for y. while #1 has a greater y distance, there is a much greater difference in the distance between the x's so that would offset any difference.

so (10,2) and (50,4) covers a greater area.

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:32:34

Your sketch should show that while the first trapezoid averages a little more than double the altitude of the second, the second is clearly much more than twice as wide and hence has the greater area.

To justify this a little more precisely, the first trapezoid, which runs from x = 3 to x = 7, is 4 units wide while the second runs from x = 10 and to x = 50 and hence has a width of 40 units. The altitudes of the first trapezoid are 5 and 9,so the average altitude of the first is 7. The average altitude of the second is the average of the altitudes 2 and 4, or 3. So the first trapezoid is over twice as high, on the average, as the first. However the second is 10 times as wide, so the second trapezoid must have the greater area.

This is all the reasoning we need to answer the question. We could of course multiply average altitude by width for each trapezoid, obtaining area 7 * 4 = 28 for the first and 3 * 40 = 120 for the second. However if all we need to know is which trapezoid has a greater area, we need not bother with this step.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

i didnt' break it down into area, but i feel my math was somewhat similar, just a lot more simplistic.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:35:24

`q004. If f(x) = x^2 (meaning 'x raised to the power 2') then which is steeper, the line segment connecting the x = 2 and x = 5 points on the graph of f(x), or the line segment connecting the x = -1 and x = 7 points on the same graph? Explain the basisof your reasoning.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

i am a little confused on this one, so i am going to skip to the answer to see how it works.

confidence assessment: 0

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:36:11

The line segment connecting x = 2 and the x = 5 points is steeper: Since f(x) = x^2, x = 2 gives y = 4 and x = 5 gives y = 25. The slope between the points is rise / run = (25 - 4) / (5 - 2) = 21 / 3 = 7.

The line segment connecting the x = -1 point (-1,1) and the x = 7 point (7,49) has a slope of (49 - 1) / (7 - -1) = 48 / 8 = 6.

The slope of the first segment is greater.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok, this was how i thought it work, but for some reason it wasn't making sense in my head. i see now how to do it and understand how it works.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:40:13

`q005. Suppose that every week of the current millenium you go to the jewler and obtain a certain number of grams of pure gold, which you then place in an old sock and bury in your backyard. Assume that buried gold lasts a long, long time ( this is so), that the the gold remains undisturbed (maybe, maybe not so), that no other source adds gold to your backyard (probably so), and that there was no gold in your yard before..

1. If you construct a graph of y = the number of grams of gold in your backyard vs. t = the number of weeks since Jan. 1, 2000, with the y axis pointing up and the t axis pointing to the right, will the points on your graph lie on a level straight line, a rising straight line, a falling straight line, a line which rises faster and faster, a line which rises but more and more slowly, a line which falls faster and faster, or a line which falls but more and more slowly?

2. Answer the same question assuming that every week you bury 1 more gram than you did the previous week.

{}3. Answer the same question assuming that every week you bury half the amount you did the previous week.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

1. they will be a rising straight line, as 1 is added to the x axis every week because time passes and because the y axis increases by a certain amount each week.

2. this line would be a rapidly increasing straight line as week 1 could have 1 gram, week 2 would have 2, and week 3, could have 3, and so on as you increase it by more and more each week.

3. the line would stil rise, but would rise more and more slowly since each succeeding week only has half the previous weeks amount.

confidence assessment: 3

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:40:29

1. If it's the same amount each week it would be a straight line.

2. Buying gold every week, the amount of gold will always increase. Since you buy more each week the rate of increase will keep increasing. So the graph will increase, and at an increasing rate.

3. Buying gold every week, the amount of gold won't ever decrease. Since you buy less each week the rate of increase will just keep falling. So the graph will increase, but at a decreasing rate. This graph will in fact approach a horizontal asymptote, since we have a geometric progression which implies an exponential function.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:43:14

`q006. Suppose that every week you go to the jewler and obtain a certain number of grams of pure gold, which you then place in an old sock and bury in your backyard. Assume that buried gold lasts a long, long time, that the the gold remains undisturbed, and that no other source adds gold to your backyard.

1. If you graph the rate at which gold is accumulating from week to week vs. tne number of weeks since Jan 1, 2000, will the points on your graph lie on a level straight line, a rising straight line, a falling straight line, a line which rises faster and faster, a line which rises but more and more slowly, a line which falls faster and faster, or a line which falls but more and more slowly?

2. Answer the same question assuming that every week you bury 1 more gram than you did the previous week.

3. Answer the same question assuming that every week you bury half the amount you did the previous week.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

1. should be a level straight line since you are adding the same amount from week to week, as such it will be at a constant rate.

2. in this case, it would be a rising straight line, since each week adds 1 more then the previous week did.

3. it would be a decreasing rate, since you are adding less and less each week.

confidence assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:44:11

This set of questions is different from the preceding set. This question now asks about a graph of rate vs. time, whereas the last was about the graph of quantity vs. time.

Question 1: This question concerns the graph of the rate at which gold accumulates, which in this case, since you buy the same amount eact week, is constant. The graph would be a horizontal straight line.

Question 2: Each week you buy one more gram than the week before, so the rate goes up each week by 1 gram per week. You thus get a risingstraight line because the increase in the rate is the same from one week to the next.

Question 3. Since half the previous amount will be half of a declining amount, the rate will decrease while remaining positive, so the graph remains positive as it decreases more and more slowly. The rate approaches but never reaches zero.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

question 3 i did not answer really well, i did recogzine the question was asking about rate and not amount this time though. my answer was similar but could have been better i think

You didn't have a bad answer. Of course anything, including the given solutions, can be improved. But you demonstrated good understanding of the question.

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:51:23

``q007. If the depth of water in a container is given, in centimeters, by 100 - 2 t + .01 t^2, where t is clock time in seconds, then what are the depths at clock times t = 30, t = 40 and t = 60? On the average is depth changing more rapidly during the first time interval or the second?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

it changes more rapidly in the 1st interval.

100-2(30)+.01(30)^2=49

100-2(40)+.01(40)^2=36

100-2(60)+.01(60)^2=13

t=40 - t=30 = 10 diff

so in 10secs, there was a 13 difference in interval 1, which would equal more than 1cm/sec

t=60 - t=40 = 20 sec diff

so in 20 sec, there was a 20cm diff, equalling 1cm/sec

so since interval one was more than 1/sec it is more rapid

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:51:32

At t = 30 we get depth = 100 - 2 t + .01 t^2 = 100 - 2 * 30 + .01 * 30^2 = 49.

At t = 40 we get depth = 100 - 2 t + .01 t^2 = 100 - 2 * 40 + .01 * 40^2 = 36.

At t = 60 we get depth = 100 - 2 t + .01 t^2 = 100 - 2 * 60 + .01 * 60^2 = 16.

49 cm - 36 cm = 13 cm change in 10 sec or 1.3 cm/s on the average.

36 cm - 16 cm = 20 cm change in 20 sec or 1.0 cm/s on the average.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

ok

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:54:44

`q008. If the rate at which water descends in a container is given, in cm/s, by 10 - .1 t, where t is clock time in seconds, then at what rate is water descending when t = 10, and at what rate is it descending when t = 20? How much would you therefore expect the water level to change during this 10-second interval?

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

water is decreasing at a rate of 9cm at t=10 and 8cm at t=20.

10-.1(10) = 9

10-.1(20)=8

i do not remember exactly how to figure out the 2nd part

confidence assessment: 1

.................................................

......!!!!!!!!...................................

17:55:46

At t = 10 sec the rate function gives us 10 - .1 * 10 = 10 - 1 = 9, meaning a rate of 9 cm / sec.

At t = 20 sec the rate function gives us 10 - .1 * 20 = 10 - 2 = 8, meaning a rate of 8 cm / sec.

The rate never goes below 8 cm/s, so in 10 sec the change wouldn't be less than 80 cm.

The rate never goes above 9 cm/s, so in 10 sec the change wouldn't be greater than 90 cm.

Any answer that isn't between 80 cm and 90 cm doesn't fit the given conditions..

The rate change is a linear function of t. Therefore the average rate is the average of the two rates, or 9.5 cm/s.

The average of the rates is 8.5 cm/sec. In 10 sec that would imply a change of 85 cm.

......!!!!!!!!...................................

RESPONSE -->

i should have figured that one out easy, as i had the right numbers to figure it out. all i had to do was take the average of the 2 numbers to get the answer

self critique assessment: 2

.................................................

&#

Good work. See my notes and let me know if you have questions. &#