pearl pendulum

#$&*

Phy 231

Your 'pearl pendulum' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.

** 19:56:41 02-09-2013 **

** **

The simple device used in this experiment can serve as an accurate timing device when the 'beats' of the pendulum are synchronized with two events separated by a

consistent time interval. Observations of this system are consistent with the observed and theoretically predicted behavior of pendulums. Most students report that

the experiment takes around an hour, with a range from 30 minutes to 2 hours, and in a few cases longer.

The Pearl Pendulum as shown below a bead (sometimes called a 'pearl', as the bead used in the original version was a fake plastic pearl) on a string, attached to bolt

glued to the top of a metal bracket, using a magnet to 'clamp' the string (in most current versions of the apparatus the bolt glued to the top of the bracket, which

proved to be unhelpful, is not included).

Your package will probably contain a bead about 1 cm in diameter, with a short piece of string through its center. This bead will be in your initial materials

package. The string protrudes from both sides of the bead, but will probably protrude more on one side than on the other. To suspend the bead, you need only tie a

piece of thread (a spool of which should be included in your package) around the longer bit of protruding string.

If your package didn't include the bead described above, it will include a bead and a piece of thin copper wire, as shown below. If you have this, you will need to

construct the pendulum as indicated below.

The wire is formed into a loop with the two ends protruding, and threaded through the bead.

The ends are pulled through forming a small loop at the top.

The protruding ends are twisted together then flattened against the bottom of the bead.

The above pictures were actually of a steel ball and a thicker wire. The bead and wire you have in your kit look something like this:

When suspended from the pendulum bracket by a thread the system might look something like the picture below. If the pendulum is pulled back and released, it will

bounce back to the bracket, rebound, and repeat its motion a number of times.

However note that in this picture the bracket is resting on end with the bolt glued to it; the bracket is not vertical.

The pearl appears to hanging in its equilibrium position, with a little space between it and the bracket.

As you will soon see, if the bead is just barely touching the bracket when it hangs at its equilibrium position, the rhythm of the bouncing pendulum will remain

constant.

The bead is referred to below as the 'pearl', since the first design of this experiment used fake pearls cut from a cheap necklace. (The beads currently in use were

also cut from a cheap plastic necklace; these beads have a higher coefficient of restitution than the originals, and they therefore work better).

When the pearl is released it swings back to the bracket, bounces off then swings back again, repeatedly striking the bracket. The magnet can be used to clamp the

thread so, after being adjusted to the desired length, the length of the pendulum remains constant.

If you have just a plain bracket then you simply tilt the bracket in order to achieve a constant rhythm, as described below.

You should set the system up and allow the pearl to bounce off the bracket a few times. The bracket should be stationary; the pendulum is simply pulled back and

released to bounce against the bracket.

Note whether the pearl strikes the bracket more and more frequently or less and less frequently with each bounce. If the pearl does not bounce off the bracket several

times after being released, it might be because the copper wire below the pearl is getting in the way. If necessary you can clip some of the excess wire (being

careful to leave enough to keep the bead from falling through).

If the bracket is tilted back a bit, as shown in the next figure below, the pearl will naturally rest against the bracket. Tilt the bracket back a little bit and,

keeping the bracket stationary, release the pendulum.

Listen to the rhythm of the sounds made by the ball striking the bracket.

Do the sounds get closer together or further apart, or does the rhythm remain steady? I.e., does the rhythm get faster or slower, or does it remain constant?

Repeat a few times if necessary until you are sure of your answer.

Insert your answer into the space below, and give a good description of what you heard.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

When equilibrium has the pearl just barely making contact with the bracket, it sounds to me like the sounds are consistenly spaced. The rhythm is steady, even though

the distance the bead is bouncing decreases with each bounce.

When the bracket is tilted back and equilibrium has the pearl resting against the bracket, the sounds are spaced closer and closer together with each bounce-- the

rhythm gets faster and faster until the bead stops bouncing and comes to rest against the bracket.

#$&*

If the bracket is tilted forward a bit, as shown in the figure below, the pearl will naturally hang away from the bracket. Tilt the bracket forward a little bit (not

as much as shown in the figure, but enough that the pearl definitely hangs away from the bracket). Keep the bracket stationary and release the pendulum. Note whether

the pearl strikes the bracket more and more frequently or less and less frequently with each bounce.

Again listen to the rhythm of the sounds made by the ball striking the bracket.

Do the sounds get closer together or further apart, or does the rhythm remain steady? I.e., does the rhythm get faster or slower, or does it remain constant?

Repeat a few times if necessary until you are sure of your answer.

Insert your answer into the box below, and give a good description of what you heard.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

When the bracket is tilted forward so the bead hangs away from the bracket, the sounds are spaced further and further apart-- the rhythm gets slower with each bounce

until eventually the bead comes to rest at equilibrium, hanging away from the bracket once again.

#$&*

If the bracket is placed on a perfectly level surface, the pearl will hang straight down, just barely touching the bracket. However most surfaces on which you might

place the bracket aren't perfectly level. Place the bracket on a smooth surface and if necessary tilt it a bit by placing a shim (for a shim you could for example use

a thin coin, though on most surfaces you wouldn't need anything this thick; for a thinner shim you could use a tightly folded piece of paper) beneath one end or the

other, adjusting the position and/or the thickness of the shim until the hanging pearl just barely touches the bracket. Pull the pearl back then release it.

If the rhythm of the pearl bouncing off the bracket speeds up or slows down, adjust the level of the bracket, either tilting it a bit forward or a bit backward, until

the rhythm becomes steady.

Describe the process you used to make the rhythm steady, and describe just how steady the rhythm was, and how many times the pendulum hit the bracket..

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

To make the rhythm steady, I placed the bracket and a plastic ruler on the thin sheet of plywood that came in the lab kit. Then I put the front end of the bracket on

the very edge of the ruler, and looked from directly above as I slid the ruler further and further beneath the bracket until I saw the bead come just barely into

contact with the vertical part of the bracket.

This resulted in a steady beat that hit the bracket 34 times. The beat seemed to slow just the slightest amount starting around the 29th beat, so I consider this

setup to be highly accurate.

#$&*

On a reasonably level surface, place one domino under each of the top left and right corners of your closed textbook, with the front cover upward. Place the bracket

pendulum on the middle of the book, with the base of the bracket parallel to one of the sides of the book. Release the pendulum and observe whether the sounds get

further apart or closer together. Note the orientation of the bracket and whether the sounds get further apart or closer together.

Now rotate the base of the bracket 45 degrees counterclockwise and repeat, being sure to note the orientation of the bracket and the progression of the sounds.

Rotate another 45 degrees and repeat.

Continue until you have rotated the bracket back to its original position.

Report your results in such a way that another student could read them and duplicate your experiment exactly. Try to report neither more nor less information than

necessary to accomplish this goal. Use a new line to report the results of each new rotation.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

Position, number of beats, spacing of beats

0deg, 23 beats, spaced closer and closer together

45deg, 27 beats, spaced very slightly closer together on last few beats

90deg, 27 beats, spaced slightly farther apart on last few beats

135deg, 29 beats, spaced farther and farther apart

180deg, 25 beats, spaced much farther apart

225deg, 25 beats, spaced much farther apart

270deg, 27 beats, spaced slightly farther apart on last few beats

315deg, 25 beats, spaced closer and closer together

0deg refers to bracket oriented with vertical piece facing top of book. 180deg refers to bracket oriented with vertical piece facing bottom of book. Rotation is

counterclockwise from 0deg.

#$&*

Describe how you would orient the bracket to obtain the most regular 'beat' of the pendulum.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

The optimal orientation for consistent spacing of beats is in the 45 degree position, with the vertical piece of the bracket facing the upper left corner of the book.

The beats were very steady, with an almost imperceptible speeding up of the beat for just the very last few beats.

#$&*

Orient the bracket in this position and start the TIMER program. Adjust the pendulum to the maximum length at which it will still bounce regularly.

Practice the following procedure for a few minutes:

Pull the pendulum back, ready to release it, and place your finger on the button of your mouse. Have the mouse cursor over the Click to Time Event button. Concentrate

on releasing the pendulum at the same instant you click the mouse, and release both. Do this until you are sure you are consistently releasing the pendulum and

clicking the mouse at the same time.

Now you will repeat the same procedure, but you will time both the instant of release and the instant at which the pendulum 'hits' the bracket the second time. The

order of events will be:

click and release the pendulum simultaneously

the pendulum will strike the bracket but you won't click

the pendulum will strike the bracket a second time and you will click at the same instant

We don't attempt to time the first 'hit', which occurs too soon after release for most people to time it accurately.

Practice until you can release the pendulum with one mouse click, then click again at the same instant as the second strike of the pendulum.

When you think you can conduct an accurate timing, initialize the timer and do it for real. Do a series of 8 trials, and record the 8 time intervals below, one

interval to each line. You may round the time intervals to the nearest .001 second.

Starting in the 9th line, briefly describe what your numbers mean and how they were obtained.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

0.676s

0.672s

0.637s

0.637s

0.683s

0.648s

0.637s

0.660s

Series of 8 trials; time interval from release of pendulum to second strike of pendulum against bracket.

Obtained using TIMER program and clicking at moment of release and moment of 2nd impact with bracket. Results from TIMER output rounded to .001s.

#$&*

Finally, you will repeat once more, but you will time every second 'hit' until the pendulum stops swinging. That is, you will release, time the second 'hit', then

time the fourth, the sixth, etc..

Practice until you think you are timing the events accurately, then do four trials.

Report your time intervals for each trial on a separate line, with commas between the intervals. For example look at the format shown below:

.925, .887, .938, .911

.925, .879, .941

etc.

In the example just given, the second trial only observed 3 intervals, while the first observed 4. This is possible. Just report what happens in the space below.

Then on a new line give a brief description of what your results mean and how they were obtained.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

.586, .734, .805, .758, .738, .758, .707, .809, .723, .723, .695

.672, .711, .746, .769, .758, .711, .746, .793, .711, .695, .723, .723, .684

.672, .734, .785, .758, .746, .719, .734, .769, .723, .746, .734, .746, .746

.625, .781, .773, .734, .707, .769, .757, .734, .723, .746, .793, .746

Series of time duration for 2-beat intervals, as measured with TIMER program. Initial click at release of pendulum, subsequent clicks at even-numbered beats until

pendulum stopped.

#$&*

Now measure the length of the pendulum. (For the two-pearl system the length is measured from the bottom of the 'fixed' pearl (the one glued to the top of the

bracket) to the middle of the 'swinging' pearl. For the system which uses a bolt and magnet at the top instead of the pearl, you would measure from the bottom of the

bolt to the center of the pearl). Using a ruler marked in centimeters, you should be able to find this length to within the nearest millimeter.

What is the length of the pendulum?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

14.1cm

length of pendulum

#$&*

If you have timed these events accurately, you will see clearly that the time from release to the second 'hit' appears to be different than the time between the second

'hit' and the fourth 'hit'.

On the average,

how much time elapses between release and the second 'hit' of the pendulum,

how much time elapses between the second and fourth 'hit' and

how much time elapses between the fourth and sixth 'hit'?

Report your results as three numbers separated by commas, e.g.,

.63, .97, .94

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

.639, .740, .777

Average duration of time between release and second beat, second and fourth beat, fourth and sixth beat

#$&*

A full cycle of a free pendulum is from extreme point to equilibrium to opposite extreme point then back to equilibrium and finally back to the original extreme point

(or almost to the original extreme point, since the pendulum is losing energy as it swings)..

The pearl pendulum is released from an 'extreme point' and strikes the bracket at its equilibrium point, so it doesn't get to the opposite extreme point.

It an interval consists of motion from extreme point to equilibrium, or from equilibrium to extreme point, how many intervals occur between release and the first

'hit'?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

1 interval from release to first hit

#$&*

How many intervals, as the word was described above, occur between the first 'hit' and the second 'hit'? Explain how your description differs from that of the motion

between release and the first 'hit'.

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

2 intervals between first and second hit

Between the first and second hit, the pendulum returns to extreme point, so it travels from equilibrium to extreme (1 interval) and then extreme to equilibrium (2nd

interval). This differs from the duration from release to first hit, which involves only traveling once from extreme to equilibrium (1 interval).

#$&*

@&

Return to eq, eq to extreme, extreme to eq is 3 'intervals'. You haven't stated this.

*@

How many intervals occur between release and the second 'hit', and how does this differ from the motion between the second 'hit' and the fourth 'hit'?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

3 intervals between release and second hit.

Here, the bead travels from extreme to equilibrium (1st interval-- the first beat, which we don't time) then equilibrium to extreme (2nd interval) and then back to

equilibrium (3rd interval-- the second beat, which is when we click the timer).

4 intervals between second and fourth hit.

Here, the bead begins at equilibrium, and completes its first interval back to extreme, then back to equilrium (2nd interval-- the third beat, which we don't time),

then back to extreme (3rd interval) and finally back to equilibrium (4th interval, fourth beat, which we time).

#$&*

How many intervals occur between the second 'hit' and the fourth 'hit', and how does this differ from a similar description of the motion between the fourth 'hit' and

the sixth 'hit'?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

The motion between the second and fourth hit contains 4 intervals, as described above. The description of the motion from fourth to sixth hit also contains 4

intervals and should be described in the same way: beginning at equilibrium (the beat that begins the time-interval we're taking), it completes an interval up to

extreme, then back to equilibrium (the odd-numbered beat that we're not timing), then back to extreme and back to equilibrium, striking the bracket for the beat we ARE

timing.

#$&*

Why would we expect that the time interval between release to 2d 'hit' should be shorter than the subsequent timed intervals (2d to 4th, 4th to 6th, etc.)?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

From release to 2nd hit involves three intervals of motion. Subsequent time-intervals involve four intervals of motion, so they should take longer.

#$&*

Would we expect additional subsequent time intervals to increase, decrease or stay the same?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

If our bracket it set up to ideal conditions with the bead just barely making contact at equilibrium, then the beat should remain constant and the subsequent time

intervals should all be about the same.

In reality, they do eventually speed up or slow down very slightly.

#$&*

What evidence does this experiment provide for or against the hypothesis that the length of a pendulum's swing depends only on its length, and is independent of how

far it actually swings?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

We can visually observe that the distance the bead travels is decreasing with each swing. Yet, the beat is fairly consistent; the time it takes the bead to travel

from equilibrium to extreme and back is roughly the same. The duration of the swing does not change with the distance of the swing.

#$&*

Your instructor is trying to gauge the typical time spent by students on these experiments. Please answer the following question as accurately as you can,

understanding that your answer will be used only for the stated purpose and has no bearing on your grades:

Approximately how long did it take you to complete this experiment?

your response &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

(start in the next line):

90 minutes

#$&*

@&

Good.

This means that your times between subseuquent hits would ideally be in the ratio of 4 to 3, or 1.33 to the times between release and first hit.

You could check to see how close that ratio is to 1.33.

*@