Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
the two programs that you ask us to save to our hd at the beginning of Asst 0 have the exact same name, are they the same program?
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
I see a bunch of numbers
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
1 208.6406 208.6406
2 208.7344 .09375
3 208.8594 .125
4 209.0156 .15625
5 209.1719 .15625
6 209.3438 .171875
7 209.5 .15625
8 209.6406 .140625
9 209.8281 .1875
10 209.9844 .15625
11 210.1719 .1875
12 210.3281 .15625
13 210.4688 .140625
14 210.6094 .140625
15 210.6875 .078125
16 210.7969 .109375
17 210.8594 .0625
18 210.9688 .109375
19 211.0156 .046875
20 211.1719 .15625
21 211.3281 .15625
22 211.8125 .484375
23 211.9688 .15625
24 212.0781 .109375
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.15625
I just picked one and typed it, I am pushed for time right now
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.140625, 1
.1565, 1
.171875, 3
.1875, 5
.203125, 1
Your general comment to this point
I have no clue what any of these numbers mean
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
i doubt it
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
either it is flawed or it was designed with limited information and data I don't know
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
2.46875
2.828125
2.578125
2.578125
2.8125
2.796875
3
2.875
2.78125
3.171875
Your general comment to this point:
I'm still lost
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
I don't know
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
c
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
1 2.46875 2.46875
2 5.296875 2.828125
3 7.875 2.578125
4 10.45313 2.578125
about 6 minutes, I picked a busy time to do it
You're OK here. More meanings will become clear in upcoming experiments. After using the TIMER in a couple more experiments, I recommend you go back and think about the implications of some of these results.
Your 'timer program' report has been received. Scroll down through the document to see any comments I might have inserted, and my final comment at the end.
Your General Comment
the two programs that you ask us to save to our hd at the beginning of Asst 0 have the exact same name, are they the same program?
Describe what you see on your first 10 clicks
I see a bunch of numbers
Your TIMER data from 20 fast clicks
1 208.6406 208.6406
2 208.7344 .09375
3 208.8594 .125
4 209.0156 .15625
5 209.1719 .15625
6 209.3438 .171875
7 209.5 .15625
8 209.6406 .140625
9 209.8281 .1875
10 209.9844 .15625
11 210.1719 .1875
12 210.3281 .15625
13 210.4688 .140625
14 210.6094 .140625
15 210.6875 .078125
16 210.7969 .109375
17 210.8594 .0625
18 210.9688 .109375
19 211.0156 .046875
20 211.1719 .15625
21 211.3281 .15625
22 211.8125 .484375
23 211.9688 .15625
24 212.0781 .109375
Your average time interval for 20 time intervals
.15625
I just picked one and typed it, I am pushed for time right now
Your frequency distribution for the 20 time intervals (interval, number of times it was observed)
.140625, 1
.1565, 1
.171875, 3
.1875, 5
.203125, 1
Your general comment to this point
I have no clue what any of these numbers mean
Why did you observe only certain time intervals?
i doubt it
What did you see when you looked at the differences between time successive time intervals?
either it is flawed or it was designed with limited information and data I don't know
Your time intervals for 7 complete breaths:
2.46875
2.828125
2.578125
2.578125
2.8125
2.796875
3
2.875
2.78125
3.171875
Your general comment to this point:
I'm still lost
Why did you rarely, if ever, observe that same time interval twice?
I don't know
Do you think this program is accurate to .1 or .01 ...
c
Copy of a few lines of your spreadsheet from the TIMER program.
1 2.46875 2.46875
2 5.296875 2.828125
3 7.875 2.578125
4 10.45313 2.578125
about 6 minutes, I picked a busy time to do it
You're OK here. More meanings will become clear in upcoming experiments. After using the TIMER in a couple more experiments, I recommend you go back and think about the implications of some of these results.