course mth 151
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:45:01 Query 2.1.12 counting #'s 4 to 14 List the elements of the set.
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> {4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14}
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:45:27 **A list of the elements would just be 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> this list gives all counting numbers between 4 and 14
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:50:01 query 2.1.24 set builder for set of presidents between LBJ and Clinton ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> {LBJ, Nixon, ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton} .................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:50:53 ** Set-builder notation is {x|x is a president who served between Lyndon Johnson and William Clinton} x is a variable and the condition 'x is a president who served between Lyndon Johnson and William Clinton' tells you what possible things the variable can be. COMMON ERROR: It's incorrect to say {x | x is the set of presidents who served between Johnson and Clinton}. x is a president, not a set of presidents. Should be {x|x is a president who served between Lyndon Johnson and William Clinton} ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> ok so i should have listed only one president?
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:51:04 2.1.40 finite or infinite: set of rat #'s 0 to 1 ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> finite
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:51:43 ** Rational numbers have form p/q, where p and q are integers. Numbers like 5/8, 57/31, -3/5, -57843/7843, etc. The subset {1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... } is just by itself an infinite set of rational numbers between 0 and 1. Then you have things like 348/937, and 39827389871 / 4982743789, and a whole infinite bunch of others. There are thus infinitely many rational numbers in any interval of the real line. COMMON MISCONCEPTION: finite, because it doesn't go on forever Rational numbers have form p/q, where p and q are integers. Numbers like 5/8, 57/31, -3/5, -57843/7843, etc. Not all of these lie between 0 and 1, of course. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> so the correct answer would be infinite
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:54:18 2.1.48 n(A), A={x|x is a U.S. senator} What is n(A) and why?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> {50} b/c there are fifty states and each state has one senator .................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:54:40 ** n(A) stands for the number of elements in the set--in this case for the number of senators. There are 100, 2 from each State. So n(A) = 100. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> oh im sorry 2 for each state
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:55:01 query 2.1.54 {x|x is neagtive number}
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> well defined
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:55:11 ** This notation means all possible values of x such that x is a negative number. The question is whether the set is well-defined or not. It is in fact well-defined because there is a definite way to decide whether a given object is an element of the set, because there is a definite way to determine whether an object is a negative number or not. ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: The set is well-defined because you have a criterion by which you can definitely decide whether something is or is not in the set. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> ok
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:57:12 2.1.72 true or false 2 not subset of {7,6,5,4}
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> true
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:58:15 ** The statement is that 2 is not a subset. The statement is true because 2 isn't even a set, it's just a number. {2} is a set and could be a subset of something. 2 is just a number; it isn't a set so it can't be a subset of anything. The usual answer is that 2 isn't a subset because 2 isn't in the set. However that's not the correct reason. The correct reason is that 2 isn't a set and a subset must be a set. COMMON MISCONCEPTION: the statement says that 2 is not a subset, not that it is not an element of the set. So the reason it's not a subset is that 2 isn't a set at all, so it can't be a subset of anything. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> 2 isn't a set and a subset must be a set .................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:58:58 2.1.84 C={4,10,12}, B={2,4,8,10} Is it true or false that every element of C is also an element of B?
......!!!!!!!!...................................
RESPONSE --> false 12 is an element of c and not and element of b
.................................................
......!!!!!!!!...................................
13:59:09 ** Specifically it's false because the element 12 is in C but not in B. ** ......!!!!!!!!................................... RESPONSE --> exactly
.................................................
ō攽滵愓}w臂w譮薕幦M壵轚褃箌 assignment #002 \枿堂覓M檾棡纫短藏袭簴醎牋� Liberal Arts Mathematics I 02-13-2006 "