#$&* course Phy 232 9/15 2 24.
.............................................
Given Solution: `aSTUDENT RESPONSE AND INSTRUCTOR COMMENT: electric field is the concentration of the electrical force ** That's a pretty good way to put it. Very specifically electric field measures the magnitude and direction of the electrical force, per unit of charge, that would be experienced by a charge placed at a given point. ** STUDENT COMMENT: Faraday explain that it reached out from the charge, so would that be a concentration? It seems to me that the concentration would be near the center of the charge and the field around it would be more like radiation extending outward weakening with distance. INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE That's a good, and very important, intuitive conception of nature of the electric field around a point charge. However the meaning of the field is the force per unit charge. If you know the magnitude and direction of the field and the charge, you can find the magnitude and direction of the force on that charge. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): I knew the field was a force but I did not know it is the force per unit charge. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 2 ********************************************* Question: `qExplain how we calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field at a given point of the x-y plane due to a given point charge at the origin. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: The magnitude is calculated by F = (k*q*Q) / d^2. If we use E = F/q then, E = (k*Q)/d^2. So, we know when q is positive, the electric field points away from the origin and vice versa. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The magnitude of the force on a test charge Q is F = k q1 * Q / r^2, where q1 is the charge at the origin. The electric field is therefore F / Q = k q1 / r^2. The direction is the direction of the force experienced by a positive test charge. The electric field is therefore directly away from the origin (if q1 is positive) or directly toward the origin (if q1 is negative). The direction of the electric field is in the direction of the displacement vector from the origin to the point if q1 is positive, and opposite to this direction if q1 is negative. To find the direction of this displacement vector we find arctan(y / x), adding 180 deg if x is negative. If q1 is positive then this is the direction of the field. If q1 is negative then the direction of the field is opposite this direction, 180 degrees more or less than the calculated angle. ** STUDENT QUESTION Why is it just Q and not Q2? INSTRUCTOR RESPONSE q1 is a charge that's actually present. Q is a 'test charge' that really isn't there. We calculate the effect q1 has on this point by calculating what the force would be if a charge Q was placed at the point in question. This situation can and will be expanded to a number of actual charges, e.g., q1, q2, ..., qn, at specific points. If we want to find the field at some point, we imagine a 'test charge' Q at that point and figure out the force exerted on it by all the actual charges q1, q2, ..., qn. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): How do we know to do arctan(y/x)? I did not think about the adding 180 degrees if it is negative, but that makes perfect sense. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 2
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The -2 nC charge lies 3 cm above the 6 nC charge, so it exerts force 9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2 * (-2 * 10^-9 C) ( 6 * 10^-9 C) / (.03 m)^2 = .00012 N. The force between the two charges is a force of attraction, so the direction of the force on the 6 nC charge is the positive y direction. The 5 nC charge lies at distance 4 cm from the 6 nC charge, so it exerts force 9 * 10^9 N m^2 / C^2 * (6 * 10^-9 C) ( 5 * 10^-9 C) / (.04 m)^2 = .00017 N, approx... The charges repel, so this force is clearly in the positive x direction. The resultant force is therefore about sqrt( (.00011 N)^2 + (.00017 N)^2) = .0002 N. The direction of the force is in the first quadrant, at angle arcTan(y component / x component) = arcTan(.00017 N / (.00011 N)) = 57 degrees. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): N/A ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: N/A ********************************************* Question: `qQuery univ phy 21.80 11th edition 21.76 (10th edition 22.60) quadrupole (q at (0,a), (0, -a), -2q at origin). For y > a what is the magnitude and direction of the electric field at (0, y)? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Magnitude = k*q/(r^2) The distances for y>a are, r = y-a, y+a, and y and their charges are q,q,-2q. So, plugging in y-a, y+a, and y for r and using the charges, you get the sum as: (k*q)/((y-a)^2) + (k*q)/((y+a)^2) -2(k*q)/((y)^2) = ([(k*q*(y^2 + 2*y*a + a^2)) + ((k*q)*(y^2 - 2*y*a + a^2))] / [(y-a)^2 * (y+a)^2]) - [(2*k*q)/(y^2)] = ([k*q*(2*y^2 + 2*a^2)]/[(y - a)^2*(y + a)^2]) - [(2*k*q)/(y^2)] = [2*k*q *y^2(y^2 + a^2) - 2*k*q((y - a)^2*(y + a)^2)] / [y^2 * (y - a)^2 * (y+a)^2] = [2*k*q*(y^4 + a^2*y^2 - (y^2 - a^2)^2)] / [y^2 * (y - a)^2 * (y+a)^2] = [2*k*q*(3*a^2*y^2 + a^4)] / [y^2 * (y - a)^2 * (y+a)^2] We can take away a^4 because it is insignificantly small. Also we can make the denominator just y^6 because it is so close to just that. Thus, the new equation becomes [6*k*q*a^2*y^2] / y^6 = (6*k*q*a^2) / y^4. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The magnitude of the field due to the charge at a point is k q / r^2. For a point at coordinate y on the y axis, for y > a, we have distances r = y-a, y+a and y. The charges at these distances are respectively q, q and -2q. So the field is k*q/(y - a)^2 + k*q/(y + a)^2 - 2k*q/y^2 = 2*k*q*(y^2 + a^2)/((y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) - 2*k*q/y^2 = 2*k*q* [(y^2 + a^2)* y^2 - (y+a)^2 ( y-a)^2) ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - (y^2 - a^2)^2 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [y^4 + a^2 y^2 - y^4 + 2 y^2 a^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) = 2*k*q* [ 3 a^2 y^2 - a^4 ] / ( y^2 (y + a)^2*(y - a)^2) . For large y the denominator is close to y^6 and the a^4 in the numerator is insignifant compared to a^2 y^2 sothe expression becomes 6 k q a^2 / y^4, which is inversely proportional to y^4. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): I knew the equation is proportional to y^4 I just did not note it. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 3 ********************************************* Question: `qquery univ 22.102 annulus in yz plane inner radius R1 outer R2, charge density `sigma. What is a total electric charge on the annulus? YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your solution: Q (total charge) = sigma * Area = sigma * (pi*R2^2 - pi*R1^2) Note: R2^2 - R1^2 = r^2 dQ = 2*pi*r*`dr*sigma I am unsure of how to finish this problem. I know using the derivative will be helpful. confidence rating #$&*: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.............................................
Given Solution: `a** The total charge on the annulus is the product Q = sigma * A = sigma * (pi R2^2 - pi R1^2). To find the field at distance x along the x axis, due to the charge in the annulus, we first find the field due to a thin ring of charge: The charge in a thin ring of radius r and ring thickness `dr is the product `dQ = 2 pi r `dr * sigma of ring area and area density. From any small segment of this ring the electric field at a point of the x axis would be directed at angle arctan( r / x ) with respect to the x axis. By either formal trigonometry or similar triangles we see that the component parallel to the x axis will be in the proportion x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) to the magnitude of the field from this small segment. By symmetry only the xcomponent of the field will remain when we sum over the entire ring. So the field due to the ring will be in the same proportion to the expression k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2). Thus the field due to this thin ring will be magnitude of field due to thin ring: k `dQ / (x^2 + r^2) * x / sqrt (x^2 + r^2) = 2 pi k r `dr * x / (x^2 + r^2)^(3/2). Summing over all such thin rings, which run from r = R1 to r = R2, we obtain the integral magnitude of field = integral ( 2 pi k r x /(x^2 + r^2)^(3/2) with respect to r, from R1 to R2). Evaluating the integral we find that magnitude of field = 2* pi k *x* | 1 /sqrt(x^2 + r1^2) - 1 / sqrt(x^2 + r2^2) | The direction of the field is along the x axis. If the point is close to the origin then x is close to 0 and x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) is approximately equal to x / r, for any r much larger than x. This is because the derivative of x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) with respect to x is r^2 / (x^2+r^2)^(3/2), which for x = 0 is just 1/r, having no x dependence. So at small displacement `dx from the origin the field strength will just be some constant multiple of `dx. ** &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Self-critique (if necessary): This concept “By either formal trigonometry or similar triangles we see that the component parallel to the x axis will be in the proportion x / sqrt(x^2 + r^2) to the magnitude of the field from this small segment.” Was a little tricky for me at first, but now that I get that, I understand the rest of the answer. ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique Rating: 3 " Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique rating: " Self-critique (if necessary): ------------------------------------------------ Self-critique rating: #*&!