Summary of uniformly accelerated motion in terms of definitions and graphs:

All of the theory of uniformly accelerated motion comes from two basic definitions  and one fact about the v vs. t graph:

In terms of graphs, we first observe the following:

It follows from what has gone before that:

Very similar reasoning tells us that

 

 

To solve a uniform acceleration problem:

(The v vs. t graph is linear and the average velocity occurs at the middle of the time interval, with v0 and vf at the beginning and the end of the time interval.)

(Use units for every quantity).

To analyze today's experiment:

To 'analyze' means to find the values of all the variables v0, vf, `dt, `ds, a as well as vAve and `dv, using the above procedures.

To find the components of the gravitational force vector for an object on an incline:

To understand the forces on an object moving on a rigid incline under the influence of gravity and friction:

Force and acceleration

The idea of work/energy in terms of a 2-ramp system

Analysis of Data for Energy Conservation Experiment 1:

You should have data for the experiment in which you observed a ball descending one ramp from rest starting as point A, rolling directly at point B to a second ascending ramp then rolling to rest at point C on the second ramp.  In this experiment you will have measured the vertical and horizontal positions of the ball, information from which you can determine the slope of each ramp, and will have information from which you can determine the clock times at points A, B and C.

You are given the following information:

Using this information for one run of the experiment:

Be sure you have included units at every step of every calculation, and be sure you have actually done the algebra of the units.

How negligible is the percent change in the distance of the ball from the center of the Earth during this experiment?

Obtaining the formula for KE and, while we're at it, the work-energy theorem:

If an object of mass m and initially moving at velocity v0 is subject to a net force F_net while it moves through displacement `ds, then:

Discrepant Event:

Using 1/2 m v^2 as the expression for KE in our analysis of the 2-ramp experiment, we will find that the PE gain of the steel ball on the steel track, between points B and C, is greater than the KE loss.  So with no application of external forces, the system we are observing ends up with more mechanical energy at C than at B.

This result is not consistent with the law of energy conservation.

The problem is that 1/2 m v^2 doesn't include the entire kinetic energy of the ball.  v is only the velocity of the center of mass of the ball.  The ball is also rotating, so each of the particles that make up the ball has an organized, non-random velocity of rotation about the center, and this velocity also contributes to the total kinetic energy of the ball.

In this experiment, the total kinetic energy of the ball is somewhat more than 7/5 as great as the translational KE expression 1/2 m v^2 would indicate.  If the ball was rolling without slipping on an inclined plane, the 7/5 would be exact.  However the ball is rolling, most likely without slipping, in a grooved track, and this causes the relative proportion of rotational KE to be even higher.  The analysis of the rotational motion on an inclined plane will fall within the scope of this course, later in the term.  The analysis for the grooved track will be an optional special topic addressed by only a few students, if any.

However we still need to obtain data accurate enough to verify this discrepant event, and ultimately to verify energy conservation for this system.