If an object moves fast for a long time it goes a long ways (a supersonic jet traveling for a few hours can cross the Pacific Ocean).  If the an object moves fast for a short time it can still go pretty far (a bullet will travel the distance of a football field in a fraction of a second).  If an object moves slowly for a long time it can go pretty far (a snail can travel the length of a football field in  a week or so).   If an object moves slowly for a short time it doesn't go far at all (if a snail travels for a fraction of a second you can't even really see its progress).

The graphs below use v vs. t graphs to illustrate what happens if an object moves at a constant fast velocity.

In the case of a fast object moving for a long time the rectangle has much greater area than in the case of a fast object moving for a short time, representing the fact that the first object moves a long ways, the second not as far.

wpe189.jpg (6029 bytes)wpe18A.jpg (6181 bytes)

The next two graphs illustrate what happens if an object moves at a constant slow velocity.

In the case of a slow object moving for a long time the rectangle has much greater area than in the case of a slow object moving for a short time, though not nearly as much as in the case of the first graph above where the object moved fast for a long time. 

wpe191.jpg (6280 bytes)wpe192.jpg (5092 bytes)

The graphs below show that a slow rate of velocity change does not necessarily imply a small distance.

We see from this example that the rate at which velocity changes is not directly related to how far it goes.  An object whose velocity changes slowly can move a long ways if it starts out with a significant velocity.

Another way of saying this is that velocity is what affects the distance moved in a time interval, not acceleration.  Acceleration does have an effect, but only indirectly in that acceleration changes velocity.

wpe182.jpg (6319 bytes)wpe183.jpg (6728 bytes)