Video Versions Introductory Motion Experiments
Instructions: You are responsible for reading and
following these instructions.
The video clips for these experiments are on CD #0; the
number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this document under the writeup
for each experiment.
- There is a q_a_ version of each of these experiments,
which are recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions
on this page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more
efficient to use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download
the file q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the
Supervised Study Current Semester pages.
Video Version Experiment 2: Average velocity vs.
slope for a ball on a single ramp; rate of change of velocity.
Video Version Experiment 3: The final velocity of
a uniformly accelerating object released from rest is double its average velocity.
Video Version Experiment 4: Acceleration is
constant for an object rolling down a uniform incline.
Video Version Experiment 5: Determination of the
acceleration of gravity using acceleration vs. slope (ramp slope < .1) and by
synchronizing time of fall with pendulum.
Video Version Experiment 6: The horizontal range
of a projectile with initial velocity in the horizontal direction is an accurate indicator
of its initial velocity.
Instructions:
Writeups of all experiments in this course are
to be submitted electronically as Rich Text files, according to the following guidelines:
- Except where inappropriate, all raw data are to be
presented the form of clearly labeled tables, and are to be indicated as raw data.
(Note: 'Raw data' refers to anything you observe directly, without doing any
calculations of any kind).
- All questions posed in the experiment are to be answered in
self-documented form.
- Procedures and analysis are to be described in
self-documented narrative form.
- When analysis involves repeated use of a calculation
procedure, only a single example of that procedure is required. For subsequent uses
of the procedure, it is sufficient to say something like 'using the same procedure we
obtain the results inthe third column ... '
- Wherever appropriate, significant intermediate calculations
and results are to be presented in the form of clearly labeled tables.
- Whenever appropriate, results are to be presented in the
form of clearly labeled graphs.
- Graphs are to be included in Microsoft Excel format, using
a scatter plot (no other type of plot is appropriate to the graphing of most scientific
information). If you with to use another format, specify that format and submit a
sample for the approval of the instructor. Do not use bitmaps (e.g., graphs created
using Paint or Paintbrush). You may if you wish scan neatly made handdrawn graphs
into your document.
- When you are asked to do something with a graph that is not
easily accomplished with Excel or an approved alternative, describe in words what you did
and what results were obtained.
Experiment 2: Measuring average velocity for a cart
rolling from rest down a uniform incline; Average velocity vs. slope; Inferring
acceleration.
Read the following notes:
- The video clips for these experiments are on CD
#0; the number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this
document under the writeup for each experiment.
- It is suggested that you use the Pearl Pendulum rather
than synchronizing a handheld pendulum as shown in the experiment. The Pearl
Pendulum is easier to use and gives more accurate results.
- There is a q_a_ version of this experiment, which is
recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions on this
page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more efficient to
use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download the file
q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the Supervised
Study Current Semester pages.
See the corresponding video
files on the CD (see note in red at the top of this document) entitled Introductory Video
Experiments, video
clips # 3. Reference also #'s 1 and 2 for pendulum as a timer.
You run the CD by running the disk_0.htm file in the root folder of the CD.
Access Video Experiments by clicking on the Video Experiment Clips link in that
document.
We measure the time required
for a cart to accelerate from rest down various uniform inclines with slopes between 0 and
.1. For each incline we determine the average velocity of the cart. We then plot average
velocity vs. slope and determine whether the graph appears to follow a straight line.
Using the asserted propositions that the cart accelerates uniformly and that the final
velocity of an object which accelerates uniformly from rest is double its average
velocity, we determine for each incline the average rate at which the velocity of the cart
changes. We then construct a graph of the average rate of velocity change vs. incline
slope. We finally determine the slope of the straight line which best fit our data points.
As instructed on the video clip, determine the time
required for the cart to roll the length of the ramp, starting from rest, for each of the
four ramp slopes.
Note the following:
- The slope of the ramp is the rise divided by the run
between the two measured points.
- The run is the distance parallel to the tabletop.
Put your data into a table:
- Decide how the data can best be organized to allow a
reader to make a quick comparison between the motion resulting from the different slopes.
- Include in your table everything that was measured,
including your pendulum lengths and the number of swings down the incline.
Describe exactly what you did to obtain the data.
Describe your procedure in detail.
Analyze the data:
For each pendulum length determine the time of a
complete cycle of oscillation. Then use this information to determine the time
required for the cart to accelerate down the incline.
Determine the average velocity for each
slope, using the distance the cart traveled and the time required.
Sketch a graph of average velocity vs. ramp slope.
- Is the graph linear (that is, does it seem to stay
close to some straight line)? If not describe how it varies from linear.
For a straight ramp, if the cart starts
from rest (and not otherwise), we expect that the final velocity will be double
the average velocity.
- Using this fact, make a table of final velocity vs.
ramp slope.
Using your table of final velocity vs. ramp slope,
keeping in mind that since the cart starts from rest its initial velocity is zero,
determine for each ramp the rate at which velocity changes.
Plot the rate of velocity change vs. ramp slope.
- Fit the most appropriate straight line to your
graph.
- Determine the slope of this line.
Submit results, including
- an organized data table
- each of the tables you constructed
in the process of analyzing the experiment
- an explanation of how you analyzed
your data
- a detailed description of each graph
and how well the straight line fits
- complete and detailed,
self-documented answers to all questions
Experiment 3: The final velocity of a uniformly
accelerating object released from rest is double its average velocity.
The video clips for these experiments are on CD #0;
the number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this document under
the writeup for each experiment.
There is a q_a_ version of this experiment, which is
recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions on this
page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more efficient to
use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download the file
q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the Supervised
Study Current Semester pages.
By timing an object as it accelerates from rest down one uniform incline, then as it
travels along a second slight incline elevated just enough to keep the object moving at a
uniform velocity, we test the previously asserted hypothesis that when an object
accelerates uniformly from rest, its final velocity will be double its average velocity.
We do this by graphing the velocity on the second ramp vs. the velocity on the first. We
interpret the slope of this graph to test our hypothesis.
Observe the two-ramp system
on the CD
(see note in red at the top of this document). Select Introductory Video Experiments
and view video clips #'s 7 and 8.
Using the first of the two clips attempt to synchronize
a pendulum so that the time required to accelerate a distance
down the first ramp from rest corresponds to precisely one-half
of a complete cycle (i.e., from release to the far point on the
other side of equilibrium). See if the pendulum then returns to its
original position in precisely the time required for the ball to move double
the first distance on the second ramp, on which its velocity is
reasonably constant. When we have this synchronization we know that the time spent
on the first ramp is equal to the time spent on the second.
- If the pendulum synchronizes in this way, then we
have good evidence that the average velocity on the second
ramp is double that on the first (since the
ball traveled twice as far on the second as on the first in the same elapsed time).
Using the second clip and the TIMER program (you
should have downloaded the program along with the rest of the programs for the course; if
not go to the appropriate page and download it now), time the ball as it
travels down the first ramp and an appropriate distance across the second,
obtaining the time interval on each ramp. If you
can't figure out how to use the TIMER program, you may use a pendulum as
a timer, but this would be cumbersome. The TIMER program is very convenient and easy
to use.
- The motion of the ball down the two-ramp system is
accompanied by three sounds:
a. The sound of the
starting event,
b. The 'clink' that occurs
in the transition from the first to the second ramp, and
c. The sound of the object striking the obstacle on the second
ramp.
- Don't look at the video clip when timing, just
listen, so you don't anticipate events. Clicking on each of the three events
in turn, time the
ball from the instant of release to the instant it
reaches the end of the first ramp, then for a measured distance across
the second ramp.
- When timing, be conscious of your tendency
to anticipate some events more than others (e.g., some people might anticipate
the bump at the end more than the 'clank' from the first ramp to the second), and try to control
the tendency. Relax and let your finger on the keyboard respond to the
sounds, don't try to anticipate.
- Repeat your timing for the 20-cm
distance two more times, so that you have 3 timings for
this 20-cm distance.
- Repeat for rolls of 10 cm, 15
cm, 25 cm, 30 cm, 35 cm, ..., 50 cm down the first ramp.
- Present your data in a clearly labeled table.
Determine average velocities and plot
a graph of your results:
- For each distance, use the median
(the 'middle') value of the time required to roll down the
first ramp to determine the average velocity of the ball on that
ramp.
- For each distance, use the median
value of the time required to roll along the timed portion of the second
ramp to determine the average velocity of the ball on that ramp.
- For each distance on the first
ramp, plot the average velocity on the second ramp vs.
the average velocity on the first. Be sure you
follow the appropriate conventions in interpreting the 'vs.' in those instructions--get
the right quantity on the vertical axis, and get the right quantity on the horizontal
axis. If you aren't sure you have it right, stop at this point and email the
instructor with everything you have so far and a request to check your work.
- Sketch a straight line which comes as
close as possible, on the average, to your data points.
- Don't worry about whether the straight line actually
goes through any of the data points, worry about average
closeness; a perfect graph of real data will rarely go through the
precise position of of any data point.
- Extend your straight line in
both directions, slightly beyond the first and
last data points.
Analyze your graph and
answer questions:
- By measuring the rise and the run
of your straight line, determine its slope.
- Does your straight line pass near
the origin of your coordinate system? Why should
it or should it not do so?
- On which ramp does the ball have
the greater average velocity? Why should this be so?
- Which is the greatest and which is the least
of the following: the average velocity of the ball on the first
ramp, the initial velocity of the ball on the first ramp,
or the final velocity of the ball on the first ramp?
- Place in order, from the smallest
to the largest, indicating any 'ties':
- the average velocity of the ball on
the
- the average velocity of the ball on
the second ramp,
- the initial velocity of the ball on
the first ramp,
- the initial velocity of the ball on
the second ramp,
- the final velocity of the ball on
the first ramp, and
- the final velocity of the ball on
the second ramp ( i.e., its velocity at the instant the timing ceased,
not after you changed everything by stopping it).
- Sketch a graph of the velocity of
the ball vs. clock time from the instant it is released until
the instant timing stops on the second ramp. Indicate
the instant at which you think the ball reaches its average
velocity on the first ramp.
- Why might we suspect that the average velocity on
the second ramp should be double that on the first,
and how well does this experiment validate that hypothesis?
Analyze the potential effect of timing
errors on your results for the 30-cm first-ramp distance
(Principles of Physics students do only parts marked *)
- * For the 30-cm distance, what do
you think is the uncertainty in your measurement of the time
interval on the first ramp (e.g., +-.01 sec, +-.05 sec, +-35
hours)? Why do you think that this is an appropriate value for
the uncertainty?
- * For your estimated uncertainty,
we would expect that the actual time required was between the
observed time minus the uncertainty and
the observed time plus the uncertainty
- For example, if the observed time
is 2.3 seconds and the uncertainty is +-.02 sec,
then we expect that the actual time lies between 2.3 - .02 sec
and 2.3 + .02 sec, or between 2.1 sec and 2.5 sec.
- We might say that the actual time `dt
satisfies 2.1 < `dt < 2.5.\
- In symbols, if the actual
time is `dt, the observed time is `dtobs
and the uncertainty is tunc, then we
can say that `dt lies between the 'low estimate' `dtobs
- tunc and `dtobs + tunc.
- Written in the form of an inequality, we would say `dtobs
- tunc < `dt < `dtobs + tunc.
- * Based on your observed time and
your expected uncertainty, what are the minimum and maximum
values between which the actual time should lie?
- * Had the actual time `dt been equal
to the minimum expected value, then what would have been the average
velocity on the first ramp?
- * Had the actual time been equal to the maximum
value, what would have been the average velocity on this ramp?
- * What therefore do you expect is the minimum
value that the actual average velocity might have had on this
ramp? What is the maximum?
- * On your last graph, near the
point corresponding to the 30-cm distance, indicate this range of
velocities as explained under Q & A on the homepage, under topic
Error Bars, Rectangles and Linearity.
- Repeat this process for the second
ramp, and indicate the corresponding range of velocities as
explained under Q & A on the homepage, under topic Error Bars, Rectangles and
Linearity.
-
- Block in the rectangle defined by
your velocity ranges and see if your straight line actually passes
through this rectangle.
Repeat this analysis for every
data point on your graph (Principles of Physics students: repeat
the analysis only for the 10-cm point and the 50-cm point).
- For each data point, use the uncertainty in
`dt that is appropriate to your means of timing for each
point.
- Does your straight line pass
through all the resulting rectangles?
- If not, is it possible to draw a straight
line that passes through all the resulting rectangles?
- We have analyzed the possible effect of
timing errors.
- We might also have analyzed the effect of errors in distance
measurements.
- Would you expect these errors to be more or
less significant than timing errors, and why?
Submit results, including
- an organized data table
- a table of average velocity on the second
ramp vs. average velocity on the first
- a detailed description of your graph
of second-ramp ave vel. vs. first-ramp ave. vel. and how well the
straight line fits
- a report of the slope of your line
and whether the line seems, within experimental uncertainties, to pass
through the origin.
- a description of your graph of the vel. vs. clock
time from release to the end of the second ramp
- complete and detailed,
self-documented answers to all questions.
Experiment 4. Acceleration is constant for an object
rolling down a uniform incline.
Read the following notes:
- The video clips for these experiments are on CD
#0; the number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this
document under the writeup for each experiment.
- The Pearl Pendulum is an acceptable substitute for any
timing process, but you may also use the timing process as described on the CD. The
choice is yours.
- There is a q_a_ version of this experiment, which is
recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions on this
page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more efficient to
use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download the file
q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the Supervised
Study Current Semester pages.
By timing an object as it accelerates from rest for various distances down an incline,
we infer its average acceleration for various distances and average speeds. We then test
to validate the hypothesis that the acceleration is in fact uniform lawn the incline.
See the corresponding video
files on the CD (see note in red at the top of this document) entitled Introductor Video
Experiments,
video clip #4.
You may use some of your data from
a preceding experiment.
By timing a ball as it rolls from rest through
distances of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 cm down a uniform
incline, we determine whether the acceleration on the incline
seems to be related to either the distance the ball
rolls down the incline or to its average velocity on the incline.
- Use data from your previous experiment.
- Present your data in a clearly labeled and
organized table.
Determine the average acceleration corresponding
to each distance:
- For each distance, make any
calculations necessary to determine the time required for the object to accelerate through
that distance from rest.
- Using the results of the preceding experiment (i.e.,
the relationship between average and final velocities on the first ramp), the average
velocity and the fact that the ball started from rest, determine
the final velocity of the ball for each distance.
- Determine the change in velocity for
each distance, then using the time required for each
distance determine the average acceleration for each.
Graph acceleration vs. distance
and draw conclusions:
- Plot average acceleration vs. distance
traveled on the first ramp and decide whether the acceleration changes with
the distance in some systematic way, or whether the apparent variations
in acceleration are simply the result of unavoidable experimental
uncertainties.
- How did you make use of the results of
the preceding experiment to justify your calculation of
the acceleration in this experiment?
- Are the variations in acceleration observed
in this experiment within the range of variations to be
expected with the equipment you are using?
- Do your results support the hypothesis
that the acceleration of the ball rolling down a uniform incline
is indeed independent of how fast the ball is rolling
and of where the ball is on the ramp? If so, how do the
results support hypothesis? If not, how do the results fail to support
the hypothesis?
Analyze errors:
- Using a procedure similar to that in the preceding
experiment, determine the uncertainty in the acceleration for
each point (Principles of Physics: analyze only the 10-, 30- and
50-cm points) and indicate these uncertainties on your graph as
explained under Q & A on the homepage, under topic Error Bars, Rectangles and
Linearity.
- Is it possible to draw a straight horizontal
line that passes between the error bars for every graph
point?
- Explain why, if it is so, then we
have good support for the hypothesis that the acceleration on
the ramp is constant.
View Introductory Video Experiments
video clip #5.
Submit your results
Submit results in the usual manner.
Since you use data from a previous experiment you don't need to describe the setup,
etc.. But do describe the process of determining acceleration from you data.
Experiment 5. Determination of the acceleration of
gravity using acceleration vs. slope (ramp slope < .1), and then by using time of fall
as indicated by the pendulum timer.
The video clips for these experiments are on CD #0;
the number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this document under
the writeup for each experiment.
There is a q_a_ version of this experiment, which is
recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions on this
page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more efficient to
use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download the file
q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the Supervised
Study Current Semester pages.
For ramp slopes between 0 and .1, the acceleration of a cart down the slope is very
nearly a linear function of ramp slope, with only a 1/2 % deviation from linearity within
this range of slopes. In this experiment we determine the accelerations of the friction
car corresponding to a selection of ramp slopes within this range, and plot acceleration
vs. ramp slope. Since frictional forces and tabletop deviations from linearity will be
very nearly the same for all trials, the slope of the graph gives us the acceleration of
gravity.
Using the pendulum timer we can measure the time required for a dropped object to fall
various distances from rest under the acceleration of gravity. We can calculate the
acceleration for each distance and test hypothesis that the acceleration is the same for
all heights.
Alternatively using the pendulum timer we can synchronize the dropping of a ball with
the time required for the pendulum to complete a quarter-cycle for each of several drop
distances. If the acceleration of the dropped object is uniform, then the time required
for the object to drop should be proportional to the square root of the distance dropped.
Since the period of the pendulum is proportional to the square root of its length, it
follows that if gravity accelerates objects uniformly then the distance dropped should be
proportional to the length of the synchronize to pendulum. From the associated
proportionality constant, and from the proportionality constant for the pendulum period,
we can determine from our data the acceleration of gravity.
Part 1
For the first part of the
experiment we use the data collected in the Video Version of Experiment 2. Recall
that we observed the motion of a low-friction cart on a series of small
ramp slopes to obtain data for the acceleration of the cart vs.
the ramp slope.
Determine the acceleration and ramp
slope for each incline.
- For each ramp slope use your
measurements of the heights of the ramp ends and ramp
length to determine the slope of the ramp.
- For each ramp slope use your T
= A * Lp function from the pendulum experiment to
determine the time interval corresponding to each cycle of
the motion of the pendulum, and
- use the number of cycles to
determine the time required for the car to travel the measured
distance.
- Use the time required to accelerate
down the ramp from rest, and the distance traveled during this
time, to reason out the average velocity, final velocity and
acceleration on each ramp slope.
Graph and interpret your
results.
- Construct an accurate graph of y = cart
acceleration vs. x = ramp slope.
- Your graph points should lie near a
straight line. Draw your best fit of the straight
line and determine its x and y intercepts and
its slope.
- From the slope of the line,
determine the change in acceleration that would correspond to a change
of 1 in the slope.
- For reasons you probably do not yet understand, if
you have done the experiment correctly and accurately the slope of your graph should
be equal to the acceleration that would be experienced by the car
if it was simply dropped (or, equivalently, rolled down a
vertical ramp).
- This acceleration is called, for reasons that should
be apparent, the acceleration of gravity.
Assess the quality of your results
and analyze the potential effects of various
potential errors on your determination of the acceleration of gravity.
(Principle of Physics: * only)
- * How accurately do you think you
determined the time for each ramp slope? Describe how
you made sure that your times were accurate and consistent.
- * How close was your result to the accepted
value of the acceleration of gravity, which is 980
cm/sec/sec?
- * Exactly what is the significance of the point
where y = car acceleration is equal to zero? What
therefore is the significance of the x intercept of your
graph?
- What is the significance of the y
intercept of your graph, which occurs where x = ramp slope is zero?
- * Do the x and y intercepts
of the graph have effect on your result for of the acceleration
of gravity?
- * Suppose that the table itself had
a slope of .01, in the direction down the ramp.
- Then every actual ramp slope on
your table of acceleration vs. ramp slope should be .01 greater or
less than the ramp slope you used on your table.
- Which should it be, greater
or less?
- What effect would this have on your
graph?
- What effect would have on your
result for of the acceleration of gravity?
- Suppose that you had consistently misread the
length of the pendulum, so that for every reading it was
in fact 5 cm longer than you thought. How would this affect your
graph, and what would be the effect on your result for
of the acceleration of gravity?
Analysis of Errors (Principles students use only
first, middle and last data points)
- Using a procedure similar to that in the preceding
experiments, determine the uncertainty in the acceleration for
each of your final graph points and indicate these uncertainties on
your graph in the usual manner.
- Estimate the uncertainty in
the measurements that you used to determine each ramp slope,
and determine the range of possible ramp slopes for each
data point. Indicate these uncertainties on your graph in
the usual manner.
- For each graph point sketch the rectangle
defined by your minimum and maximum possible acceleration
and your minimum and maximum possible ramp
slope.
- What is the slope of this steepest
line that can pass through all these rectangles?
- What is the slope of the least
steep line that can pass through all these rectangles?
- What therefore is the range of possible
values of the gravitational acceleration, according to your
experiment?
Part 2
See the corresponding video
files on the CD (see note in red at the top of this document) entitled Introductor Video
Experiments,
video clips #4.
Construct a pendulum out of a washer and a thread or light string.
Synchronizing the time of fall of a second washer with the time required for a
pendulum to complete a quarter-cycle, determine pendulum lengths corresponding to a fall
of 1 meter (if you don't have a measuring device marked in meters you can convert
the lengths to inches: just multiply the number of meters by 39.37).
- Be sure to drop the washer and release the pendulum simultaneously.
- Be sure to position the pendulum so that it is just barely touching the wall when
in its equlibrium position, so that when it is released the pendulum strikes the wall just
as it reaches its natural equilibrium position. It is probably best if using a
washer pendulum if the washer of released with its edge directed toward the wall so that
the edge rather than the flat face of the washer will strike the wall. Again,
position the top of the string so that the pendulum is at equilibrium when the edge of the
washer is in contact with the wall.
- Do a couple of trials to convince yourself that if the pendulum length is half
the distance the object falls, the pendulum will strike the wall before the object reaches
the floor.
- Do a couple of trials to convince yourself that if the pendulum length is double
the distance the object falls, the pendulum will strike the wall after the object reaches
the floor.
- Now determine the range of pendulum lengths for which the sound of the object
striking the floor and the sound of the pendulum striking the wall sound
simultaneous--i.e., so you don't hear one sound and then the other, but hear them both at
the same time.
Adjust the length of the pendulum up, starting from a length equal to half the
distance of the fall, until the two sounds are simultaneous. Note the length at
which the sounds become simultaneous. Repeat several times to be sure you have the
right length. Be sure you are measuring length to the center of the pendulum bob
(the washer, or marble, or whatever is being suspended to form the pendulum).
Continue increasing the length of the pendulum until the two sounds are no
longer simultaneous. Again repeat several times to be sure you have the right
length.
Use your data to determine the acceleration of gravity:
- Assume that the length at which the two sounds really were simultaneous is
halfway between the two lengths you measured.
- Using the period vs. length relationship T = .2 * `sqrt(L), T in sec when L in
cm, for a pendulum determine the time required for a quarter-cycle at each length.
- Assuming that the time of fall was identical to the time of the quarter-cycle
reason out the average velocity, final velocity and acceleration for each trial.
Required for University Physics students, Optional for Principles of Physics and
General College Physics students:
- Modify your procedure to accomodate a drop of .5 meter.
Analyze errors:
- How much error do you think there is in the times you measured?
- How much error do you think there is in your distance measurements for pendulum
length and for the distance of fall for the ball?
- How much possible error would therefore follow for your calculated accelerations?
Submit your results
Describe the experience of listening for the two sounds. How convinced are
you that you got the right range of lengths?
Give the lengths at which the two sounds were first simultaneous, and at which
the sounds were again possible to distinguish.
Include your entire reasoning procedure, starting with finding the period of the
pendulum and ending with your result for the acceleration of gravity.
University Physics students: Do your results support the hypothesis that
the acceleration of gravity is constant?
Experiment 6. The horizontal range of a projectile
with initial velocity in the horizontal direction is an accurate indicator of its initial
velocity.
The video clips for these experiments are on CD #0;
the number(s) of the required clip(s) is(are) referred to in this document under
the writeup for each experiment.
There is a q_a_ version of this experiment, which is
recommended as an alternative if you have difficulty following the instructions on this
page. If you can follow the instructions given here it might be more efficient to
use them than the q_a_ version. If you wish to use this option download the file
q_a_ph1_vid_exp_2_6.exe from the Downloads page under Course Documents on the Supervised
Study Current Semester pages.
See the corresponding video
files on the CD (see note in red at the top of this document) entitled Introductor Video
Experiments,
video clips #11.
View also #10.
In this experiment we measure the horizontal range of a ball projected
horizontally from a ramp. Using the time required to fall to the floor we then
determine the average horizontal velocity of the ball during its fall. We test the
hypothesis that the horizontal velocity of the falling ball remains the same as at the
instant the ball left the ramp.
Because of the horizontal
orientation of the ramp at the edge of the table, the ball leaves the end of the ramp with
a velocity which is in the horizontal direction, with no vertical
component.
- The time required for the ball to
reach the floor is independent of its horizontal velocity,
as we see from dropping a coin from the edge of a table with one hand as with the other
hand we flick another coin off in the horizontal direction (the coins hit the floor
simultaneously).
- We can therefore use the distance of fall and
the horizontal distance traveled to obtain the average horizontal
velocity of the ball.
By intercepting the ball at various
heights we can determine the horizontal range and therefore the horizontal
velocity of the ball as it leaves the end of
the ramp.
First, using washers or coins as
on the video clip convince yourself that the time required for
an object to reach the floor when it initially travels in a purely horizontal
direction is independent of its initial horizontal
velocity.
Take data:
Record each vertical distance of fall and determine
the horizontal distance for each vertical distance as instructed on the video clip.
Analyze Data:
Determine the time required to fall
each distance, and use this time with the horizontal distance to
find the average horizontal velocity for each vertical distance.
- Using the distance fallen by the
ball use the formula `ds = .5 g `dt2 for a freely
falling object falling from rest to determine the time required to
fall each distance, using at `dt the median time observed for each
distance. Note that g stands for the acceleration of gravity, which is close to
980 cm/s^2
- Using the horizontal distance traveled
by the ball during this time interval and the time required to fall,
determine for each vertical distance the average horizontal
velocity of the ball as it falls.
Plot y = average horizontal velocity vs.
x = time of fall and use your plot to determine whether there is any
experimentally significant dependence of average horizontal
velocity on time or whether average horizontal velocity seems to
be independent of time and therefore constant.
- Do the differences in the horizontal
velocities seem to be the result of random experimental uncertainties and
errors in timing, or does there seemed to be a definite
progression in the horizontal velocities as time
increases?
Analysis of Errors
- Estimate the uncertainties in your
data, and indicate the results of these estimates on your graph in
the usual manner.
- Discuss the implications of these
uncertainties.
Submit a report with all
data and results in table form, with an explanation
of each step of the analysis, and with all questions
answered.